:lol:
Bunniesman, you are the idiot. You said yourself that if Souths don't sign him, Storm won't be able to "release him", or you talked about them as if they would be over the cap with him on their books. Well, they can deny him a release to Souths if it will invalidate their (Storm's) cap.
Inglis might not like it, but it's the truth, and because of your piggish f**kwit mind, you can't handle the fact that Storm may even turn out to be the ones that block this deal (if it does get blocked).
You were acting as if, when Souths don't sign him, Inglis won't go anywhere and force the Storm to be over the cap; what kind of idiot makes that claim? They can just release him to another code or another club.
Your illogical crap just made my day :lol:
It really entertains me to be playing with an intellectually redundant person like you who keeps blathering about their own intelligence......nice work buddy, you've established yourself as one of the leading trolls of this forum.
.....
*sigh* That's probably the most offensive post I've ever made. Can't say it isn't deserved though. :?
You are the most geniused, unintelligent, stubborn fool I have ever seen. You just beat Thuggdogg. Most of your post is factually inaccurate and just plain stupid.
I NEVER said that the Storm would keep. They can't and they won't. I'll bet you all the money in the world he's not a Storm player round 1 2011. They also cannot tell him what club to go to. He knows they have absolutely no bargaining power whatsoever because even him going to Souths is not as bad as them keeping him.
All he has to say to them is "release me unconditionally or f**k off...oh wait you can't do that, Redfern weather is good this time of year".
Those are the facts you fool. If Souths face a problem with the Inglis deal, it will NOT be from the Storm. The Storm are a nonissue at this point. The legal fees are settled, they're not relevant any more. The only issue now is whether Schubert really is as big an idiot as everyone thinks he is. Let's see him accuse four different businesses of risking jail time just to do Souths a favour.
Has anyone pointed out yet that the most amazing part of this whole thing is that any company actually wants to be associated with Inglis? If anything makes the deal stink, it is how unbelievable that is.
Not everyone is affected with haterism. As well as the 4 third party deals he's already got there was an article about more lining up to be involved with him down the line. He is a role model who has never put a foot wrong, he is now a married man, he's never been involved in an alcohol/drunk related issue like so many other players. He is one of the most popular players out there and one of the best, of course the sponsors are lining up.
And you think that makes the deals stink? You know the four business who are providing the 3rd party deals for him have signed statutory declarations and given them to the NRL. So do you really think all those business would risk jail time just to get Inglis to us? If you believe that then Crowe really must have a lot of photos of a lot of people in compromising positions.
NSW hates him for being a traitor, half of QLD hates him for doing the dirty on the Broncos, and Victorians either ignore his existence or hate him for the way he walked out on the Strorm.
1. He didn't walk out of the Storm. Whether they admit it or not, they needed to lose at least one of the big 4 or they'd have to gut their squad far too much.
2. Noone cares what Broncos fans think. People with such low IQ have carers and have very little purchasing power. So sponsors couldn't give a sh*t about them.
3. A lot of NSW people I know who aren't even Souths fans say they like Inglis for screwing over the Broncos. The Broncos are one of the most hated teams in this state.
So that leaves .... Souths fans?
Unless you are peddling dole cheques, commission houses, shivs or cask wine, it makes no sense targeting only Souths fans with your marketing.
I don't even like cask wine. It's yuck, I like yum drinks.