He was on even more with the Storm, was it a huge waste then? A contract that averages out to 666k a year for the best back in the league is just fine. Especially if we're smart enough to put him at fullback.
WTF has Jarryd Hayne's contract got to do with this???
We also shouldn't read too much into his 2010 performances. With no competition points to play for it's understandable if he wasn't up for it week in and week out.
With no competition points to play for he'd be in great company at Souths.
And the Storm played him at Center, where some weeks your just not going to see much of the ball. If we put him at fullback it gives him more oppurtunities to make an impact. That's why Slater was usually more consistent, his position gave him a bigger impact naturally. And another thing even before 2010, the Storm had half a team of strike weapons, Inglis didn't have to show up every week.
Slater never had to show up every week, but he did.
And if you don't see much ball at Centre, you have a big problem with your halves. I have not seen a game where Cronk hasn't shoveled the ball out wide to his left. A gun centre ALWAYS gets plenty of ball - and the halves love to hit 'em on the chest. Johns to Matt Gidley. Heather to Hodges. Sterlo to Cronin. Gower to Girdler (and later to Whatuira). JT to Lyon. Wally to Mal. A good centre always gets good ball.
If you are a centre and you suddenly play in a game where you see bugger all ball, you are playing Union.
In 2011, actual competition points + the excitement of a brand new environment + playing fullback (hopefully) gives him the chance to have his best year yet. Let's not forget he's only 23, talented players generally don't hit their peak until at least their mid 20s when their football brain catches up with their talent.
If Inglis is only going to play if his team is in the 8 then he is trouble. Souths are ALWAYS needing a win of 2 to stay in the race.