Generalzod
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,880
Now that Channel 9 has stood down Matthew for moral reasons, can they also stop advertising material that downgrade women.
Why did 4 corners use an incident that happened 7years ago as an example to promote footballers behaving badly. Why not use a recent incident?
Why did 4 corners use an incident that happened 7years ago as an example to promote footballers behaving badly. Why not use a recent incident?
What did she expect was going to happen have tea and cookies...She is much to blame as Matthew.
Now that Channel 9 has stood down Matthew for moral reasons, can they also stop advertising material that downgrade women.
If you can't see that there is something hugely intimidating and disturbing for a 19 year old teenager to be confronted with 12 grown men when she consented to two then there is something wrong with you.
Could have not said it any better, thats the crux of the whole matter.
Do you know this as fact???If you can't see that there is something hugely intimidating and disturbing for a 19 year old teenager to be confronted with 12 grown men when she consented to two then there is something wrong with you.
Or maybe she consented to having sex with Matt and someone else. When she realised that there was more people in there, she felt that she was being taken advantage of? I don't know if that is rape, but it is certainly illegal.
That is why I asked the question. Obviously the answer is no. Thanks for answering your own question on that - you clearly don't have any understanding or sympathy to victims of sexual assault.
The 9 network's marquee program Underbelly makes good ratings so its perfectly acceptbele to have a "wife basher" on there.
What Mat Newton did is a billion times worse that what Mathew Johns did. (Consentual group Sex V's Physical Spousal abuse)
Where were the calls to have his (Newton's) overgrown head to be pulled off Underbelly??
Absolutely Disgraceful Channel 9!!
IMO Johns has no other option but to seek to resolve this in court, it has gone to far in the media to regain any dignity.
I would be going on the offensive if i was him.
She admitted consensual sex with Johns, he has done nothing legally wrong. People here are also forgetting the fact she stated that players climbed through the bathroom window, that also clears him of instigating unwanted partners into the room. Apart from being a total idiot, and insulting the girls feelings with pathetic attempts at humor, he personally has been unjustly crucified by the angry mob.
A court case would involve dragging the names of the other players involved into the open.
I highly doubt Matthew Johns would want to do that.
IMO Johns has no other option but to seek to resolve this in court, it has gone to far in the media to regain any dignity.
I would be going on the offensive if i was him.
She admitted consensual sex with Johns, he has done nothing legally wrong. People here are also forgetting the fact she stated that players climbed through the bathroom window, that also clears him of instigating unwanted partners into the room. Apart from being a total idiot, and insulting the girls feelings with pathetic attempts at humor, he personally has been unjustly crucified by the angry mob.
IMO Johns has no other option but to seek to resolve this in court, it has gone to far in the media to regain any dignity.
I would be going on the offensive if i was him.
She admitted consensual sex with Johns, he has done nothing legally wrong. People here are also forgetting the fact she stated that players climbed through the bathroom window, that also clears him of instigating unwanted partners into the room. Apart from being a total idiot, and insulting the girls feelings with pathetic attempts at humor, he personally has been unjustly crucified by the angry mob.
Who would this legal action be against? The woman, Ch 9, News Ltd, Fairfax, the ABC? I'd suggest it would be dangerous for him to take any civil action, given the standard of proof required in court is much less than in a criminal case. I think a civil case would expose plenty of evidence that Johns and the other players and the Sharks would not want exposed. I'd expect his legal and PR advisors would be telling him to lie as low as possible and hope it all blows over, forgiven and forgotten and all that.