gallagher
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,800
Why do they need to be consistant if they are WRONG?
Surely getting the right result is more important than being consistant?
If they've made the wrong call once, why should others have to suffer the same injustice? It makes absolutely no sense that you believe the Gibbs call was wrong but are now calling on the judicary to make the same WRONG call for the sake of consistantly being WRONG...
Going by this crazy logic, that ridiculous call against the Dogs early in the year becomes the consistant call. The send off of Douglas becomes the norm, for the sake of consistancy of course. A forward pass got missed tonight, for mine that was a mistake but for the sake of consistancy, we should now allow ALL forward passes :roll: are we serious!?
So Scott Logan say gets sent off in the first minute for a lazy high shot. The next set that the opponents are defending,says wests, and Gibbs does a similar lazy head shot. No send off for him. You'd be happy with that result?