GongPanther
Referee
- Messages
- 28,676
Already addressed by the NRL this morning as people have been repeatedly telling you - https://www.nrl.com/nrl-welcomes-jarryd-haynes-return/tabid/10874/newsid/99875/default.aspx
You have it the wrong way around. He is not a registered rugby league player. He is not transferring from one club to another considering he has not been under contract to any rugby league club for 2 years. If I want an example to use, I don't recall any "clearance" being given by Canterbury to the Roosters when they signed SBW.
I don't think clearances apply in the way you are interpreting them. If they were, they would run afoul of restraint or trade laws and would have been struck-down like transfer fees were in the Tutty v NSWRL case.
If everyone has a closer look at the last sentence in that link from the NRL.
"The decision required NRL approval which was given in "this case" in the best interests of the game."
So how can this be taken? In this Hayne case,have they made an exception to the 30th June deadline for the interests of the game?