Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Yeah I'm so illiterate. I'm just bashing the keyboard randomly so I must just be the luckiest person alive to be getting it all right.
Explain to me which rule I've misinterpreted. I know full well an attacking player can be tackled in the air. All I'm saying is the same boot down the throat principle should apply in this situation if the attacker wants to avoid getting tackled
:lol: You are literally too stupid for words
Says the bias genius who doesn't know the rules of rugby league.
Well to be fair this rule about kicking a bloke in the face to avoid contact was only invented this morning
Are these the images that prove without any doubt that Slater wasn't looking anywhere near Klemmer? And yet dumb merkins like you are still saying he kicked him the head. Must be another bias dogs twat. Klemmer made contact with a player in mid-air and wasn't contesting the ball. That's illegal. End of story. Even if bias tards don't get it.
Bias is as bias does sir.
He didn't instigate anything. He jumped to catch a ball. He has every right to do so. The contact came from a player who had no right to make ANY contact, the chaser. I know that blind bias makes already dopey people even more geniused but this is ridiculous.
Of course he did. He ran into a player who was in mid-air. And he has no right to do so under the rules unless he is contesting the ball, which he wasn't. This is what the bias dumb merkins don't get. It's called the international laws of the game of rugby league. If you're too thick to understand them or too bias to interpret them correctly, stay the f**k out of debates about rulings.
