How could "protecting myself" be considered foul play in anyones book?
Because stupid kartns like you are suggesting he kicked him. So explain how he did this while not looking, not bending his knee in a kicking motion and while apparently moving laterally through the air like something out of the matrix. I assume you can't.Hey now, unfathomable explanations are your job, it's not entertaining otherwise. Explain the eyes, how were the eyes important?
So no extension of the leg is allowed when jumping for the ball?
That position would actually hinder more than help, he'd be much safer with his knees to his chest (which is the way most fullbacks catch, as far as I have observed).How could "protecting myself" be considered foul play in anyones book?
Because stupid kartns like you are suggesting he kicked him. So explain how he did this while not looking, not bending his knee in a kicking motion and while apparently moving laterally through the air like something out of the matrix. I assume you can't.
If Klemmer tackles him mid air it's a penalty. If Klemmer tackles him when he lands it's fair play. You can't kick a bloke mid air for the same reason you can't run the ball up with your elbow cocked to protect yourself from a possible high tackleHow could "protecting myself" be considered foul play in anyones book?
Because stupid kartns like you are suggesting he kicked him. So explain how he did this while not looking, not bending his knee in a kicking motion and while apparently moving laterally through the air like something out of the matrix. I assume you can't.
You complain about an ad hominem argument and then throw out a red herring. What does his ability have to do with him making dangerous plays? Fact is what he did was both unnecessary and dangerous.
Wow Canard you've really taken up the cause.
You should dedicate the next 15 years of your life to becoming a QC.
Then you could be legal counsel for Melbourne and get free dick snot off Bellamy and Slater.
At least 15 other fullbacks in the NRL do it without throwing their boots out at defenders. Why does Slater need to?
It shows there was no intention, which is what you bias dogs twats are suggesting. He also needs to, you know, actually kick him. Contact between a boot and something is not a kick. My boot is on contact with the floor but I'm not kicking it. It is also impossible to make contact unless Klemmer is running at him. So explain how under the rules of the game that say a defender CANNOT make contact with a player in the air that Klemmer did not do this. If he made contact, he is in the wrong. That's all there is to it.So you've got to be looking at something to have kicked it? That's what you are saying yeah?
But thats the same argument you made? I was demonstrating how silly a reason it was to say he shouldn't do it.
Are you saying this is what Slater did?So according to you this is not a kick?
Are you saying this is what Slater did?
Not helping your reputation as one of the forum window washers.
It shows there was no intention, which is what you bias dogs twats are suggesting. He also needs to, you know, actually kick him. Contact between a boot and something is not a kick. My boot is on contact with the floor but I'm not kicking it. It is also impossible to make contact unless Klemmer is running at him. So explain how under the rules of the game that say a defender CANNOT make contact with a player in the air that Klemmer did not do this. If he made contact, he is in the wrong. That's all there is to it.