No justice at all in this system. He was punished for the injury, not the tackle. The ridiculousness can be seen if you imagine Latrell was MORE reckless, not less, got him even higher, and collected him around the forehead area. It wouldn't have been as bad an injury and he wouldn't be out for 6 weeks.
That is not fair in anyway. Worse tackles can lead to injury and relatively minor misdeeds can lead to catastrophe. There should be zero weight given to injury when deciding on punishments.
I know you're being attacked for this viewpoint, but you're actually sort of right.
Had Manu not broken his cheekbone and been able to rearrange his facial structure with a sneeze, it very well could have been less than six weeks. Had Latrell been contrite (that means apologetic) he might have got less than six weeks.
In the same way a drink driver, or a speeding driver gets a bigger sentence or fine if they hurt or kill someone. If Latrell flies over and misses him, probably a week. If he knocks Manu out and it doesn't look that awful, 3 weeks. But he f**king annihilated him. He chose to fly in, leading with a shoulder (and an arm that would've smashed him anyway) and Manu was badly hurt. That's fair. That's human nature. You're always going to get more for a severe injury. The same applies with the law in general. Common assault v GBH etc.
Latrell is not hard done by, just FYI. Neither is your team.