you sound like john ribot circa 1997 until he realized nobody wants to watch Adelaide vs canberra
You sound like a bloke who has never ventured out of Sydney or had any real world experience. See I can do personal insults as well
By the way Didn’t Super League out rate the ARL? You can’t complain about people not watching in Adelaide if you don’t have a team there. As an analogy. same as if I were the CEO of a company and complained about people not wanting to buy my product when I don’t want to sell to them. It makes no sense.
Firstly, no team is going to die so long as TV money is so high. That’s a great thing.
Secondly, there are high rating (TV/attendance) Sydney teams (St George, South Sydney, Parramatta, Tigers and Dogs when they are going well) and low rating Sydney teams (Cronulla, Manly, Roosters and Penrith). The low rating teams are low rating because of a few reasons - either the demographics of the area, history of the club or the club hasn’t been able to considerably expand their supporter base outside of the area they represent for whatever reason. This is exactly the same outside of Sydney. This is a fairly obvious point that you seem to want to contest for whatever reason.
Thirdly, you can have your Sydney teams but that doesn’t mean we should add to it with the Bears for instance (which is completely insane) or keep adding to areas to consolidate markets you already have. A competition with true national presence is always going to earn more money from TV and advertising as well as from attendances than a competition which doesn’t. It’s pretty simple and you even used an example from a national competition to argue against this point, which again makes no sense.