What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Inu Lovers

Blair

Coach
Messages
11,204
It's not a Channel nine game.
The Broncos Vs Knights game at Suncorp is the 9 game.

OK, it'll be the usual spot at the Irish Bar up the street then. Should be a 2 pm (AEST) kick-off. Is anyone else going to the Monday night Penrith game? Should be a real good one.

The Panthers think they've 'turned the corner' (and they're not the only ones).
 
Last edited:

Micistm

Bench
Messages
4,470
Hope The Beast has a blinder on Sunday! I'm tired of bagging him, even if I can't shake the nerves about his general play.

Same. I bag the guy, but feel bad doing it. We all love the big fella!:lol: And tbh, the main reason this has been a discussion thing for the last couple of weeks is not even really to do with Manu- More Bluey and the double standard of who he plays and who he doesn't when certain players are brilliant one minute and terrible the next-some he will accept that issue, Manu, and others he won't...Inu.
But you can say the same over many coaches who obviously have faith in certain players and play favourites.
 
Messages
10,047
Can come at the Manu thing from both angles personally

Enjoy watching him play for the kiwis, get nervous in a lot of situations with him but enjoy watching him go around

When playing against Manly though, I am always really keen for him taking the hitups from inside the 20, because there is always a drop ball while playing it or an offload that puts somebody else under pressure as well
 

Blair

Coach
Messages
11,204
Although, it was noted last year that Manu was pretty faultless in the three big games following his semi-final shocker v Brisbane. In the big games I'd always have him. However, he's costing us a few games getting there (at least two this season, no?)

And with Tupou, watching him live earlier this season v Parra, during one of our final tries he had a clear break up the field and looked to have great speed. I'm surprised he only has an average reputation.
 

TheDMC

Bench
Messages
3,419
I wonder how a midseason transfer effects the salary cap? any way we can take advantage of it?

What are the financial implications for the clubs in the mid-season transfer process?
Here's a hypothetical example. Let's look at a player named Duncan Biscuits who plays for Darwin. Duncan is contracted until the end of 2013 for $300,000 per season. At the end of May, Duncan would have been paid seven months or $175,000.
Therefore he is owed $425,000 (five months of 2012, plus 2013). Another club asks Darwin if Duncan can be released to play for them. The new club offers him $350,000 for the same period. For Duncan to move clubs, Darwin will have to pay Duncan the extra $75,000 he would have earned if he stayed. By doing so, Darwin has 'freed up' $300,000 to recruit another player for 2013. Darwin must also absorb the extra $75,000 they paid Duncan into their salary cap.

http://www.nrl.com/understanding-mid-season-player-moves/tabid/10874/newsid/67755/default.aspx
 
Messages
3,741
I thought this article should be posted here... Pretty good work by our club and terrible work by your club.

We're only paying 50k to have him for the rest of the season and we'll be paying a lot less for him for the rest of his contract.

CANTERBURY are paying just $50,000 to have match-winner Krisnan Inu on their books for the bulk of this season.

Their recent signing of the Kiwi international from the Warriors could turn out to be the best business any club does this season, considering the ability Inu has to either set up or score freakish tries.

Inu was on a contract worth $325,000 a season at the Warriors which ran until the end of next year. And, since player contracts begin on November 1, the Warriors had already paid nearly seven months of his wages - about $182,500 - when they gave him a release last week.

Advertisement: Story continues below

But of the remaining fee - about $142,500 - the Bulldogs are paying only $50,000, which means Inu is on a second-tier contract at the club. The Herald has learned that, to complete the deal to have Inu taken off their books, the Warriors agreed to pay almost two-thirds of what was left on his deal for this season.

It is not unusual for clubs to pay some of the money left on a player's contract if they want to offload them, and it made sense for the Warriors since Inu was on $325,000 again next season and he had struggled to make first grade this season, appearing just three times in the first 11 rounds.

But one club's trash is sometimes another's treasure, and the Bulldogs were prepared on gamble on finding the key to the enigmatic winger or centre.

The downside of Inu's game is his penchant for making big mistakes as well as big plays, but the Bulldogs are banking on two-time premiership coach Des Hasler weeding the rubbish out of his game and making him the bargain buy of the year.

Canterbury signed Inu until the end of 2015. They originally negotiated to sign him from next season, but after being hit by a dramatic injury toll affecting their rostered wingers they made a successful bid to pick him up immediately. Under the deal, the Warriors are not paying any of Inu's wages for next season, but the Bulldogs still got a potential bargain there as well, because Inu, to get a long-term deal, was prepared to sign for about $100,000 less per season than he was on at the Warriors.

The bonus for the Warriors, and the reason they were prepared to pay some of his remaining wages this season, is that by being able to offload a highly-paid player who they decided was surplus to their needs they suddenly have space under the salary cap for next season.

Asked how the Inu release evolved, Warriors chief executive Wayne Scurrah said: ''We explained to Krisnan that it was unlikely he would be looking at a new contract here, on top of the current one that ended next season.

''His management went looking for opportunities for him and came up with a three-year offer at the Bulldogs, starting next year. Then, with the injuries the Bulldogs had, the club became keen on getting him straight away. We just wanted to do the right thing by the player.

''There were no issues with Krisnan off the field. The situation was that he wasn't getting picked in first grade, and, given the level of contract he was on, that explains it all. He was disappointed to go, and we wished him the best.''

Asked if he wished to confirm the financial arrangement the Warriors and Bulldogs had come to regarding Inu for this season, Scurrah replied: ''I don't want to go into that. We were comfortable with the deal.''

Canterbury chief executive Todd Greenberg didn't want to talk figures either. ''I'm not going to get into contract specifics,'' he said. ''All I will say is that we're very happy with the deal we did on Krisnan.''

Inu starred for Canterbury in their win over Sydney Roosters on Monday night, and will go around again for the Bulldogs in their game against South Sydney at ANZ Stadium tonight.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...#ixzz1wYHTRu5d
 

Benek

Juniors
Messages
1,974
I can't believe this! I assumed we would be paying part of the remaining contract, but two thirds. Ridiculous.
 

Fast Eddie

First Grade
Messages
8,085
This season is probably the least interested I've been in them since 01, mainly down to my dislike of McClennan.
 

ozbash

Referee
Messages
26,922
Good judgement imo.

He wasnt worth sfa playing nswrl.

Actually $50 k is more than he's worth...
 

Skram

Juniors
Messages
489
''There were no issues with Krisnan off the field. The situation was that he wasn't getting picked in first grade, and, given the level of contract he was on, that explains it all. He was disappointed to go, and we wished him the best.''

Asked if he wished to confirm the financial arrangement the Warriors and Bulldogs had come to regarding Inu for this season, Scurrah replied: ''I don't want to go into that. We were comfortable with the deal.''http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...#ixzz1wYHTRu5d

What a crock of sh*t, so instead of keeping him they save $50,000 and get the contract off the books, which means sweet FA unless they use that money to sign someone else which doesn't seem overly likely. In either case wouldn't it have been much more astute to just wait until the end of the season and offload his entire next season contract, as they've done, but with having an extremely talented backup available for us and not another club?
Nothing about this move seems like good management or planning.
 

Latest posts

Top