If you're going to debate, try not comparing apples and oranges. The AFL game in question was played at the same time as another, the NRL game was standalone. The AFL game was non heartland states. The NRL game was heartland states.
To get a meaningful comparison you would have to compare Broncos v Easts to a standalone game involving Melbourne and Perth teams in the top 4.
I'm not sure if you've heard, but the same merkins own your club.I've never needed to be given a reason not to buy Newscorps rot. Let the merkins burn
I'm not sure if you've heard, but the same merkins own your club.
So? The club have acted independently of them for years.
It's like you don't even read the thread before posting you total f**kwit.
Have you read anything at all about what is going on recently???
Apparently the AFL is going to take over in Sydney and Brisbane, comparing the two Sydney based ratings is entirely appropriate.
A game rating in Melbourne is TOTALLY irrelevant to the discussion
Anybody arguing that the AFL is going to take over Sydney and Brisbane is dumb. Will never happen. The best case scenario for the AFL is for AFL to make itself the number 2 winter sport in NSW and QLD just like the best case scenario for the NRL is to be the number 2 sport in the southern states. Anyone predicting more than that is a moron. It's media hysteria.
This is like Liverpool fans boycotting The Sun and it's still the most circulated newspaper in the UK:lol:
That's the very point we were making, yet you waded in and ignorantly started defending the AFL ratings.
Pointing out that ratings were being compared in completely different contexts is not ignorant.