flippikat
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,335
I think you've put a lot of thought & passion into this, and your points are really well made.My team went to superleague, and im grateful they did, if not for them maybe there is no team far out west of sydney, and we'd be as fkd as north sydney are, and there is a majority of reasons why Sydney won't expand in NSW ever again, im also glad that the warriors, cowboys and somewhat reds did also too, as they are places that RL needs to be at top flight, had they not gone to SL they'd all be where the crushers and chargers were, and unfortunately the reds didn't last, but in hindsight dropping perth and bris2 wasn't the way to go, as we now in the next decade will be finally back to expanding there again.
Personally im not an advocate for rationalization, but since its happened, we've only gone backwards up until now, if anything we need to expand moreso, get upto 20 clubs, then see if there's any need for NSWRL clubs to rationalize to further expand or relocate, i feel there's a good spread of teams in Sydney, but a need to move a few permanently in better locations of future growth, like tigers in Campbelltown/Liverpool and Roosters North of the Bridge, atleast in terms of public fan days, weekly training and junior catchments, being in concord and bondi doesn't serve the greater sydney area, like the other sydney clubs do, besides "souths" is basically the city.
Even after we get to 20 clubs, with maybe SEQ3, SEQ4, Cairns-PNG, and NZ2, i can see 2 teams from sydney like tigers or roosters for example taking up lucrative opportunities in Wa & Sa, but not now and not until we get to 20 teams and a better finances that aren't soley reliant on broadcast money, the foundation clubs need to stand, they are the draw cards of the competition, and all current clubs need to stand as they are the brands of the NRL, but WHERE they stand is another question entirely, im all for expansion, and a few relocales but only if the club itself wants to thru necessity, but no mergers or rationalization
The big thing that makes me uneasy is the never-ending cycle of bailouts for Sydney clubs.. and some clubs seem to hit those rocky waters often.
If expansion to 20 clubs is first (say, Brisbane 2, Perth, Adelaide, NZ2 not necessarily in that order), THEN a focus on Sydney after that, then we miss opportunities in the next decade to realign the Sydney map as you describe.
I think both expansion and a re-draw of Sydney need to happen simultaneously over the next decade.. a tough prospect, but do-able. I agree with you that mergers aren't the way forward (given their woeful track record), but a combination of relocation & re-drawing the map (eg Roosters including the northern suburbs as you said) is the way forward.