chiefy1
Bench
- Messages
- 2,663
Shame that no-one else can now that you’ve f**ked up the quote.
lol , it's my phone
Shame that no-one else can now that you’ve f**ked up the quote.
I saw but f**k himShame that no-one else can now that you’ve f**ked up the quote.
Is that the one where some muppet from Penrith tries to show how smart he is but ends up looking like a dick?Ever seen the movie clueless?
Retaining elite players also means paying overs because you need to get close to the stupid money offered by clubs like the Tigers and Dogs. You might retain a player a bit cheaper if he has a family established in one a team city like Townsville or Melbourne, but even the Warriors don't seem to have any retention advantages, given their results.That just backs what I am saying. Trying to get an elite player from other clubs generaly means paying overs and a lot more......
Is that the one where some muppet from Penrith tries to show how smart he is but ends up looking like a dick?
Retaining elite players also means paying overs because you need to get close to the stupid money offered by clubs like the Tigers and Dogs.
I think the way the stars are remunerated (getting paid three or four times the mean salary of $300k) means that by the time the average players get their money it is well under the mean. Maybe $200k/yearAll these three mentioned are above average NRL players.
Average NRL player are guys who demand 300k contracts. Think Tim Mannah.
Good to see Moylan is taking his physio seriously.
People fail to understand that I have an excellent eye for spotting juniors.
@TheRam can back me up here.
Development is pointless if you can't retain them. That means offering something more than salary cap space. Whether that something else is geography, third party financial opportunities or a favourable work environment, we clearly haven't had those advantages. That's what we need to fix. Until then all the talk about talent identification and development is like telling poor people they need to invest their money.Getting a hard on over producing average players is for losers. Producing elites is what we MUST strive for. Elite players draw other elite players and average players too. All development clubs will produce average players, that is a given. What we want though is to have in place the best eyes for talent identification to not let the best of the best slip though our own catchment areas and what we can't find(produce) ourselves pilfer from everywhere far and wide like the Storm and Roosters do.
Who gives a stuff about average players? When you have elites, the average ones will follow as sure as night follows day. That is what development clubs primarily produce, but they are hardly anything to get excited about.
Like Hindy said. A flaccid pecker will only rise when a true star is born my friends.
Truthfully.
Is that the one where some muppet from Penrith tries to show how smart he is but ends up looking like a dick?
Development is pointless if you can't retain them. That means offering something more than salary cap space. Whether that something else is geography, third party financial opportunities or a favourable work environment, we clearly haven't had those advantages. That's what we need to fix. Until then all the talk about talent identification and development is like telling poor people they need to invest their money.
I’d fill it with shit if I got the chance.No it's the one where a forum Muppet has an avatar of the current eels halfback with his mouth wide open and wishing he could fill it.
Just saying.
You should read up on how the salary cap works.Getting a hard on over producing average players is for losers. Producing elites is what we MUST strive for. Elite players draw other elite players and average players too. All development clubs will produce average players, that is a given. What we want though is to have in place the best eyes for talent identification to not let the best of the best slip though our own catchment areas and what we can't find(produce) ourselves pilfer from everywhere far and wide like the Storm and Roosters do.
Who gives a stuff about average players? When you have elites, the average ones will follow as sure as night follows day. That is what development clubs primarily produce, but they are hardly anything to get excited about.
Like Hindy said. A flaccid pecker will only rise when a true star is born my friends.
Truthfully.
I’d fill it with shit if I got the chance.
You should read up on how the salary cap works.
You’ve just agreed with the point that I made to Hindy.No thanks. Doesn't seem to have been an issue for the Roosters either.
Having some of the best elite juniors in your squad doesn't stuff up your salary cap. But having to pay overs to acquire average players because you have a crap to average top 17 does.
You’ve just agreed with the point that I made to Hindy.
Some of. Correct. Not all of.
If you develop players you will be better off than trying to acquire them. Even the best clubs have average first graders and back ups. If we don’t have any of those it will completely f**k up our ability to recruit anyone.
You’ve just agreed with the point that I made to Hindy.
Some of. Correct. Not all of.
If you develop players you will be better off than trying to acquire them. Even the best clubs have average first graders and back ups. If we don’t have any of those it will completely f**k up our ability to recruit anyone.