Eelogical
Referee
- Messages
- 23,380
*chequeThat’s not what you were suggesting when you said that Cronk and Thurston would have been better purchases.
You did say that didn’t you? Don’t make me f**ken find it.
As for Norman being on overs, I don’t think that is the case. When his contract was renewed he was worth what we ended up paying him and could have got as much elsewhere. That’s how you measure whether we paid too much.
To suggest that we can arbitrarily change what the market decides is a bit far fetched.
I think you’d be on safer ground if you said that Norman hasn’t earnt his pay check. I think that’s something the majority of people would agree to.
To be fair, not a lot of our team should have cashed theirs this year. The Eels should have bounced a couple.