What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

News Jarryd Hayne sexual assault trials

Corner_Post

Corner_Post

Juniors
Messages
2,092
Harry O said:
Don't know, I've checked everywhere for it, but no avail
Click to expand...
It was included
www.foxsports.com.au

What we couldn’t tell you until Jarryd Hayne was found guilty of sexual assault

‘You f***ed the appeal’: Hayne victim’s outburst revealed after guilty verdict
www.foxsports.com.au www.foxsports.com.au

A lot of us liked Hayne as a player but what he did was f’d up. As a supporter of his, how do you view this, Hayne admitted he knew she did NOT consent to sex when he caught up with her - this is fact which basically negates all the text messages (which supporters point to as some sort of consent (notwithstanding that this is not fully correct)). So given the above is an agreed fact, is he still entitled to do what he did? If so why?
 
Corner_Post

Corner_Post

Juniors
Messages
2,092
Slammin said:
I really don't get the confusion. Jarryd sunk himself.

“I knew she didn’t want to have sex, I thought I’d just please her and that was it,” he said.
Click to expand...
This x 10000000!!! Dissecting it further:

1. Hayne says that he knows she didn’t want sex; and
2. Hayne says HE thought he would just “please her instead”. He does NOT even say that he thought that she wanted to be or was open to be pleased instead, etc. on this statement, he thought to take it upon himself to determine and action how he thought she would be pleased.

For all the people ok with Hayne’s statement, that would then imply you would be OK with either a gay/straight man/woman who knows that you do not want to have sex with them to instead to “please you”, they grope/stick fingers into you whether it is welcome or not.
 
SLRBRONCOS

SLRBRONCOS

Referee
Messages
25,171
Pneuma said:
Harry got pulled up for some pretty ordinary homophobic comments recently. As such his views about women aren’t surprising. He has issues methinks.
Click to expand...
That was ordinary. That kind of shit really f**ks with gay youth and there would definitely be some young gay people reading these forums. Luckily I’m sure they see all the allies here. He did apologise at the time, but he’s just taken that back. Disappointing.

And then our women users would come into this thread and read his ramblings. Yikes. His comments here are putrid and his ability to understand what these comments say about him is even more putrid.
 
Pneuma

Pneuma

First Grade
Messages
5,475
SLRBRONCOS said:
That was ordinary. That kind of shit really f**ks with gay youth and there would definitely be some young gay people reading these forums. Luckily I’m sure they see all the allies here. He did apologise at the time, but he’s just taken that back. Disappointing.

And then our women users would come into this thread and read his ramblings. Yikes. His comments here are putrid and his ability to understand what these comments say about him is even more putrid.
Click to expand...
I’m not engaging with him again mate. It only increases the harm he’s doing by giving him a platform. This chest beating homophobic misogynistic crap has no place here.
 
M

morton's beanie

Juniors
Messages
137
Harry O said:
I don't know if I should mention this here but here it goes,and this is the reason why I don't trust most women. 15 years ago a friend of mine was in the same situation a rape case,he always said he was innocent and that she gave him consent....she lied to police about everything....so when it went to court the jury took 5 days to work out the bitch was lying all along, and they found him not guilty. The things she was saying in court would blow your mind out..... people are very good in making up story's so they'll look like they're the innocent one...and he thought about taking it further but no point as she had no money anyway..
Click to expand...
You don't trust roughly 50% (~4 billion people) of humans based on a mate's shitty relationship with 1. Assuming you wouldn't be with someone you don't trust you must be gay or abstain entirely? When a bloke does something shitty to a mate you'll have no one left.
 
F

Floodwaters

Juniors
Messages
1,042
Corner_Post said:
This x 10000000!!! Dissecting it further:

1. Hayne says that he knows she didn’t want sex; and
2. Hayne says HE thought he would just “please her instead”. He does NOT even say that he thought that she wanted to be or was open to be pleased instead, etc. on this statement, he thought to take it upon himself to determine and action how he thought she would be pleased.

For all the people ok with Hayne’s statement, that would then imply you would be OK with either a gay/straight man/woman who knows that you do not want to have sex with them to instead to “please you”, they grope/stick fingers into you whether it is welcome or not.
Click to expand...

Main thing that done him
 
F

Floodwaters

Juniors
Messages
1,042
How long he gets will be interesting, he done 9 months of a maximum 5 year 9 month sentence, non parole period of 3 years 9 months, so if he just accepted it and done the time he'd have about 2 years left until eligible for parole. I have a feeling he'll get a longer sentence myself, should have just done his time.
 
lockyno1

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Floodwaters said:
How long he gets will be interesting, he done 9 months of a maximum 5 year 9 month sentence, non parole period of 3 years 9 months, so if he just accepted it and done the time he'd have about 2 years left until eligible for parole. I have a feeling he'll get a longer sentence myself, should have just done his time.
Click to expand...

yep lol almost deserves to get more for wasting everyone’s time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top