Oh dear this is going to be a long post because you have compacted a wide array of stupidity into two paragraphs and a line.
Your presupposition of a god based on the fact that there had to be a beginning and that implicitly something cannot come from nothing and that therefore there had to be a creator god is a blatant logical fallacy. This is because the very god in question would therefore logically have to be created, creating an endless, infinite line of gods creating each other that eventually culminates in our universe. This logical fallacy is further demonstrated through your claim that the complexity of the universe is indicative of a creator god because it could not have eventuated in any other way. This is because to follow that to its logical conclusion, such a creator god would have to be infinitely more complex than any of its creations meaning that the only way such a god could come about would be through the creative influence of another god, again creating an endless cycle of gods. I'm not going to address the points about the 'right to exist' and 'miracles' because these presuppose a supernaturalist worldview.
On your point that there are shortfalls of evolution I can't address your first point because it is rather vague but to suggest that there is a lack of transitional fossils is quite frankly ridiculous. One of the foundational principles of the theory of evolution is that all species are in a continual process of evolution meaning that every single fossil is transitional. Therefore to say that there is a lack of transitional fossils means that you are either ignorant on the subject or are just being disingenuous. Also, to link this with your later point of eyewitness evidence, there is also plenty of observable evidence of evolution, both through the continual changes of viruses as well as some examples of animals which have been introduced into new areas of the world and have significantly adapted to their new environment. If you are of the view that many Christians hold that this is simply 'micro-evolution' and that there is no evidence of 'macro-evolution' because it hasn't been directly observed I would contend that this view is simply ridiculous as it is not hard to follow a logical progression that if small changes can occur over small periods of time that large changes can occur over large periods of time.
Now on to your assertion that there is a historical record of 'God's' interaction between God and man, specifically in the ancient state of Israel. Your retconned prophesies of Jesus are pure historical revisionism and there was no view at the time by the Jews that Jesus was coming based on such 'prophesy'.
I'll now address the alleged 'prophesy' of Jesus that I'm most familiar with, that Yahweh allegedly commanding Abraham to sacrifice his own son, Isaac was somehow symbolic of Yahweh himself making the future sacrifice of Jesus. In an area before modern medicine, the son in question, Isaac was born to a 90 year old woman who was up to that point, barren and was impregnated by a 100 year old man Abraham. Isaac went on to live until the ripe old age of 180. I believe that this is all that is needed to disprove that little story as it is self-evidently wrong.
Now onto these alleged eyewitness accounts of Jesus and the miracles that he performed. Just as an aside, I'll throw in the fact that the gospel accounts are wildly contradictory, including those of perhaps the greatest miracle the resurrection. Additionally, there are no contemporary non-canonical records of a resurrection, I believe that if a convicted terrorist was executed and somehow magically returned to life that some historians would have bothered to have recorded it. Furthermore, the other great miracle of Jesus, that he was conceived not sexually but by interdimensional IVF by a deity has zero eyewitness accounts as to my knowledge there is no record that any test was performed to see whether Mary's hymen was intact for example.
instead
