And did Gus, Panthers club boss, portion any blame on the clubs or is it ALL the big, bad ARLCs fault?
Gallop is criticised for not having vision, JGrant is criticised for being too ambition....
I dont waant ANYONE put there by the clubs; if they position is dependent on keeping the clubs happy, they will just be a puppet for Gus, Nick and the rest...
Having said that, this guys name has been floating around since 2012, so he must have something special.
There is a spot representing the club bosses on the Commission yet to be filled, and it wouldnt surprise me at all if they wanted them to work full time as a Chairman-In-Exile. JW might be headed for that...
Actually I think Wests have because the Wests side of the JV took control in return for paying back Balmain's half of the debt.
Again, can't speak for the Saints, I assume they're in the process of repaying it.
OK, I wasn't certain how the Newcastle sale was structured. Even if they did the same with the Gold Coast you'd imagine that they wouldn't have lost much except for the operational losses that exceeded the club grant. We wouldn't be talking millions upon millions.
Operation costs and debt repayments over a few years,I guess you would be talking millions upon millions.And Tinkles certainly left his mark at the Knights in that regard.
Football departments are not cheap, when the average for coaches would be $500,000 plus pa.
Yeah I suppose. I thought the club grants had a decent size chunk left over for football operations and it wasn't all dedicated to lining players pockets.
What would you suggest they do, run everything from a hole in the ground covered by a tarp?It would be interesting to know how much HO building costs have been
NRL Central, NRL QRL HQ, NRL NSWRL HQ
What would you suggest they do, run everything from a hole in the ground covered by a tarp?
What would you suggest they do, run everything from a hole in the ground covered by a tarp?
That's one side of the equation, but there are other sides also.And the Commission has to bear some of the blame.
Why then was the game getting screwed each time on TV deals prior to 2012,which if had been done properly given the code more money to either bank of play with?
Why prior to 2012 was there no attempt at lobbying Govt to get Sydney stadiums and Parra rebuilt?Yet the fumblers got Govt monies.
Expenses for players wages /SOOTests went up well above CPI,not just the revenue side.No digital dept.or bunker involved prior.No integrity unit either.I'd suggest from 2018 most clubs will be financially secure.
How much was wasted on high flying consultants when Smith carried on like he was in the money world of banking.$600-700,000 pa for some.
How much was wasted on keeping the Knights and Titans from going under.Money lent to Tigers and Dragons.
How much on legals for Parramatta/Sharks.Who recoups the loss on Internationals at Campbelltown this year.
Doubling the number of on field refs, another cost.
Admin can take the blame,so can clubs, so can players who carry on like loons off the field.So can TV stations who controlled a sh*t scheduling .How about a constant negative print media, and the home of rl ch9,who pumps AFL. Player greed? Clubs badly run?
And the AFL expansion via the Lions and Suns has been a costly ,and stagnating exercise exercise,As has the expansion of the Force into WA.TV audiences for AFL in NSW and Old have stagnated at a very low level. You can pin point negatives in every code.The A league to date has stagnant crowd numbers and ditto TV ratings.
Finger pointing is useless ,everyone in the game needs to sit back and examine the part they played in getting the code to the positionit is to date.And get of their a"ses and do something about it.
Actually I think Wests have because the Wests side of the JV took control in return for paying back Balmain's half of the debt.
Again, can't speak for the Saints, I assume they're in the process of repaying it.
OK, I wasn't certain how the Newcastle sale was structured. Even if they did the same with the Gold Coast you'd imagine that they wouldn't have lost much except for the operational losses that exceeded the club grant. We wouldn't be talking millions upon millions.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain what benefit the nrl got from Dave Smith massively expanding the nrl staff? What did we get for the two years Shane Richardson was being paid big money by the NRL? Nrl management is a joke, I've no doubt they have been leaking money like nothing else ever since "billion dollar tv deal" was first mentioned.
I mean we just got knocked back for a 30m dollar loan, that says a f**king lot about the state of the nrl.