You don't honestly think Hayne can play 5/8 do you?
You seem to be forgetting his failed attempt at playing there at the start of last year. He was terrible.
:lol:
How do you think he plays?
He isn't a normal fullback. He's like a five-eighth AND a halfback in attack.
Of course he will end up at five-eighth; the reasons he failed in 2009 at that position are;
1. He had never played that position before.
2. He hadn't fully learned those skills yet.
3. He wasn't used to being a 'playmaker'.
Now that he pretty much can do anything he wants to in attack (the best at the no-look cut-out pass, bullet pass and a brilliant kicking game even when he isn't playing well), if you moved him there, there is only one factor that could kill his inevitable success;
His motivation to play away from his preferred position.
That is it. People might say "oh but what about his fitness"; that isn't an issue, and he is more than used to defending in the line, he has played centre/wing for most of his career. If you bring up that stupid consistency argument, you need to get a reality check and actually watch all the Parra games this year; in all honesty, Jarryd has only had
2 or 3 bad games at the most this year, and even on a bad day he still terrorises enemy teams.
Back to the original argument....
We can agree to disagree all you want, fans from both sides will act like stuck-up children and bitch and whine, but I solemnly believe that Hayne is the more talented player. Dugan is the better fullback, but unfortunately for Duges, he isn't in Hayne's calibre of raw talent.
Again, you can laugh at me all you want or say sh*t to me, but it doesn't make a difference on my opinion.