Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,334
He definitely pushed the boundaries. He conceded two penalties ffsOff memory he defended well and kept it simple. Didn’t push the boundaries.
He definitely pushed the boundaries. He conceded two penalties ffsOff memory he defended well and kept it simple. Didn’t push the boundaries.
You’re also not factoring in the likely increase in salary cap which reduces the proportion his salary takes up.
He definitely pushed the boundaries. He conceded two penalties ffs
I'll trust the crafty veteran over your biased observation. He's always conceded a lot of penalties. It's no accident. The benefits outweigh the costs, or they wouldn't do it.He derped the boundaries, and conceded extra tackles and defensive workload for his teammates as a result.
How many minimum wage players do you reckon we have in our top 30? 7 or 8? That’s about $250k in extra payments for the minimum wage dudes out of an increase of $2.6 million this year.Even with cap increases, his salary is still a huge chunk of change.
The minimum salary will likely increase as well which also has to take affect in the team.
Not when it's ruled a knock on or prevents an offload or slows the ruck. Most of these aren't penalised. They are advantages. Which I guess is what you meant when you said this:Flat out raking the ball out of the bloke's arms = stupid
Holding down a couple extra seconds, being a step or two offside or keeping your hand on the ball a little longer = pushing boundaries.
Yes, it's a deficiency.I'll trust the crafty veteran over your biased observation. He's always conceded a lot of penalties. It's no accident.
Only to people who don't understand the game. Maloney, Ennis and Cam Smith also gave away a lot of penalties: https://www.nrl.com/stats/players/?competition=111&season=2015&stat=1000026
It's only a liability if you fail to see all the instances that should've been penalised but weren't.
Yeah... that's deep too.Only to people who don't understand the game. Maloney, Ennis and Cam Smith also gave away a lot of penalties: https://www.nrl.com/stats/players/?competition=111&season=2015&stat=1000026
It's only a liability if you fail to see all the instances that should've been penalised but weren't.
He conceded two early penalties... the first a dubious head high call from the ref that could have happened to a 21 year old with great knees and 10 games experience. The second for trying a random strip which I reckon was pushing the boundaries to see what leeway the ref would give and set the tone for the rest of the game. At least by the 10th minute we knew strips were going to be looked at closely and likely penalised.He definitely pushed the boundaries. He conceded two penalties ffs
Well unlike you I understand why he's in the starting team. I'm just trying to help you understand. If you don't want to that's your problem.they actually contributed to their respective teams, and most probably played huge minutes.
All Hodgson has done regularly, is f^*k up. But you keep on defending at all costs.
He conceded two early penalties... the first a dubious head high call from the ref that could have happened to a 21 year old with great knees and 10 games experience. The second for trying a random strip which I reckon was pushing the boundaries to see what leeway the ref would give and set the tone for the rest of the game. At least by the 10th minute we knew strips were going to be looked at closely and likely penalised.
I guess after the week before when the ref let Walker punch the ball out of Makatoa's arms early in the second half and it led to a Rabbitohs try, it was good to know by the 10th minute against the Cowboys that forced "knock-ons" wouldn't be allowed.
Well at his age he is on the decline, so it's inevitable that his contributions will be reduced, and I have no doubt we won't take up our option, and that he will take up his player option on less money. You don't have to be hindyeleven's little birds to predict that.Also looking forward to your inevitable flip-flop on your Hodgson positivity - probably immediately following BA deciding to lessen his role in the squad, or the club deciding not to take up the option, or Hodgson himself calling it a day - miles after everyone else with eyes has seen and posted about it for themselves.
Yep, given refereeing inconsistencies, you don't know until you try. And every penalty is a chance to pressure the ref later on down the track. "Well back there, Sir, it was a penalty."I guess after the week before when the ref let Walker punch the ball out of Makatoa's arms early in the second half and it led to a Rabbitohs try, it was good to know by the 10th minute against the Cowboys that forced "knock-ons" wouldn't be allowed.
Well unlike you I understand why he's in the starting team. I'm just trying to help you understand. If you don't want to that's your problem.
Agreed. Early season is the time to fine tune strategy and tactics, given there are so few trials these days.well luckily the coach figured early on, we needed another hooker on the bench. I’m sure by seasons end Hodgson will be on the outer
Not when it's ruled a knock on or prevents an offload or slows the ruck. Most of these aren't penalised. They are advantages. Which I guess is what you meant when you said this: