What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Josh Hodgson

Messages
11,803
I wonder if journos have access to financial records or if they just read the forums.
*fortunes

Happy Good Vibes GIF by goodfortunesonly
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
I am loath to believe journo speculation.

But I have slightly more confidence in their figures than your speculation - because yours is just designed to prove your circular logic.

Your point is literally that Hodgson "can't be on that much because he isn't worth that much".
He would be on whatever he was projected to be worth at the time he signed the contract. I think $400k is reasonable. I just don't think journalists know what he's on. At this stage they would just be repeating the figure fabricated by the first journalist. The fact they're 'reporting' the same amount for his 2024 player option as they did for his 2023 component is solid evidence they just don't know.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
So this is one of the occasions that we DO believe what journos say players earn ?

Papa signs $2m x 3 years with Tigers. Nah not true. He went for less because the club is hopeless.

Reed signed $2.4m x4 years. Nah not true. He went for less because the club is hopeless.

Marata signed $3.2m x 4 years. Nah not true. He went for less because the club is hopeless.

Hodgo's option year of $400k ! Yeah that's true. The club is hopeless !

It's hard to keep up TBH.
Exactly
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
They have access to player managers.
The same player managers who have a responsibility to maintain the privacy of their clients? What incentive do they have to give honest figures to journos? And what incentive do the journos have to report this stuff accurately? They are selling entertainment not facts.
95% of articles on these sort of things would be a collaboration between the journalist and the player manager.
Surely it’s closer to 85% ffs
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
The same player managers who have a responsibility to maintain the privacy of their clients? What incentive do they have to give honest figures to journos? And what incentive do the journos have to report this stuff accurately? They are selling entertainment not facts.

Surely it’s closer to 85% ffs
The same player managers break other laws, like the Corporations Act by inciting contract breaks during contract periods, so I assume they don't care about the privacy of their clients either.

There is a fine line between news and opinion, but news is fact, and the journo's in general report facts and not opinion. Although I do agree...this is blurring these days.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
The same player managers break other laws, like the Corporations Act by inciting contract breaks during contract periods, so I assume they don't care about the privacy of their clients either.
Caring about their clients keeps them employed. I'm not suggesting they are scrupulous, I am saying they are self-interested.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
Well sharing unverifiable private information with journalists does neither. It is all risk for no reward. It belongs in cartoons, where villains act without motive ffs
 
Messages
11,803
You don’t think some player managers leak contract amounts?
To what end?
Same reason real estate agents (selectively) leak sales and auction prices into articles in compliant media - to artificially inflate future values (for their other clients, and to foster a sense of movement among the player market generally - which is where they earn their 10%s).

Ffs Pou - you try to tell us you're smarter than us dumb footy fans, lol.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,334
Same reason real estate agents (selectively) leak sales and auction prices into articles in compliant media - to artificially inflate future values (for their other clients, and to foster a sense of movement among the player market generally - which is where they earn their 10%s).
So you admit there is incentive to inflate prices while arguing they are feeding correct data to the media? You can't have it both ways ffs
Ffs Pou - you try to tell us you're smarter than us dumb footy fans, lol.
f**kING LOL!
 

Latest posts

Top