That bloke has intergrityThere was a another journalist called Kent. At the Daily Planet I think.
FMD. Emptied the magazine is right. What a catty little bitch Weidler is.http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ing-the-plot-in-brisbane-20170325-gv6hbj.html
The great Weedler has emptied an entire magazine into Benny in this piece.
Will Wayne win the war????
Has he lost his marbles?
Does he know who Jason Smith is?
Will he pay Milford a million a year to cut corners, add to his already bulging skin fold measurements and max out at 8 reps instead of 10 in the gym?
Weedler and his hack mates won't let this go. The supercoach may need to have a sit down with the media and sort out a truce before it gets very ugly.
The funny thing is that I don't think Wayne Bennett's initial response to Kent's comments were anything personal. Instead, I think it was more about a coach defending his players rather him trying to get one back at the journalist. Moreover, given that Paul Kent has been covering league for such a long time, he would surely be aware that such a reaction is pretty much the norm, not just in league, but in all sports when a player comes under media scrutiny. The fact that Paul Kent reacted the way he did on the Matty Johns Show was extremely defensive and his comments about Wayne's supposed personality changes, his personal life and his treatment of the media were both misguided and inappropriate.Wayne made three points. 1) Benji denied making the statement. 2) Benji denied speaking to Kent. 3) Benji denied making the statement directly to Kent.
Kent knows that these three points are a hostile attack on his integrity as a journalist because they provide interesting insight into his personal and journalistic ethics. On NRL 360 Kent's ego got the better of him for a moment (as it usually does) and he made a statement about Benji that was heavily implied to be a first hand factual account of that person's thoughts. There was no "allegedly" or "according to" or "rumor has it" - anyone watching that would have been left with the impression either that Paul gained that information from Marshall himself, or that it's undisputed common knowledge which it obviously was not.
Now in the meantime we find out that Kent is using his personal relationship with Ikin to needle information out of him regarding the Broncos. Since Benji denied saying that he was "horrified", and knowing that the information didn't come from Benji himself, we now know that "horrified" is somebody elses spin of events - again, something not made clear by Kent on NRL 360.
According to Kent he called up Benji afterwards to apologise. This demonstrates how easy it would have been for Kent to call up Benji in the first place and actually verify that the information relayed to him by a third party was correct before putting it out there for general consumption. And that's kind of his responsibility as a journalist. It also suggests that Kent really only cared about any backlash to Benji when he himself came under fire.
So all of this reveals a few things:
1) As a Limited News journalist, Kent doesn't feel that he is under any obligation to approach the primary subject of a story and confirm basic information about it.
2) As a Limited News journalist, Kent will go on television and pass off second hand gossip as fact.
3) As a Limited News journalist, Kent will milk his close friendship with Ikin to Ikin's detriment just to satisfy his own ego.
There's a reason why Kent's explanation is woefully nonsensical - there's no shortage of easily fooled people like yourself out there.
Do you actually know what the 'like' means?I swear NRL 360 is turning NRL into a drama series. Like the way they analyze every game gives me the shits. The whole tigers thing this week gave me the shits. Yes I'm a tigers fan and we needed a change. But there were like 20 articles or segments this week on the one subject.
At the end of the day just let the teams play footy like it's like reading new idea listening to paul Kent, ben ikin and Phil rothfield the other day.
You know if the tigers had not switched off before half time probably would have been a close loss and the whole drama would not of happened. Like if canberra had lost there would of been 20 articles on raiders in crisis. We dropped the ball 5 times over then line against Penrith shit happens they punished us. We gave a lot of dumb penalties and dropped to much ball happens every 2nd week to most teams.
Like the way they talk to aaron woods as if he is some wests tigers god because he is a regular on their show tells me they don't really watched the games and don't get it.
Like after round 1 it was rabbitohs don't get along(then they won, then it was manly(then they won), then it was tigers, now it's brisbane, like who cares teammates are allowed to have a disagreement probably in the best interest sometimes to spark a player.
Just don't need to read 20 articles. Just let me watch the footy not the footy show. It's like walking dead and talking dead or game of thrones and thrown cast where they have to analyze each minute of each episode.
The womens show .
He was so rattled haha, peacock chest came out
Weidler, Kent and Rothfield are pimples on the arse of rugby league.
NRL 360 is completely unwatchable. The womens show and god forbid the QLD show are even better than watching those 2 smug merkins trash the game with their mate Booze.