- Messages
- 77,946
Maybe that's why we have a car included in our negotiations. :lol:
FFS we can pick him up in the special limo. Sign here Justin ... ;-)
Maybe that's why we have a car included in our negotiations. :lol:
Maybe that's why we have a car included in our negotiations. :lol:
FFS we can pick him up in the special limo. Sign here Justin ... ;-)
Looks a bit blokey. Is that Jason Ryles in drag ?
got a bruise on her shin - might be a front rower
MOM is crap, and if we sign him we would be signing him on potential only. I for one prefer to use any money we have on players who are hungry for success. This is not what MOM represents as a player anymore and I don't want to take the risk of spending 150k on a fat, laterally challenged, out of form, tired and lazy forward when we are struggling with available monies at the moment.
Dont hold back Ram
Few people on here are stating that TLL is as good as staying in canberra, but why don't we tempt him with a bigger offer than canberras.Lets face it they have enough frontrowers themselvesIt's unfortunate for us that he is likely to go to the Sharks, how that is an attractive proposition at the moment I'm not sure. However I think all is not lost if we don't get Poore. I know that TLL is keen to stay with the raiders, but say if we secure (and im speculating here) his services as well as the Shackleton's, it's definetly a move in the right directionand it'd probably cost as $400-$450 to do so, rather than Poore who we'd be paying $300+ for.
Whatever happens in the market and in terms of our recruitment, you can be guaranteed this (sadly). The player(s) we recruit, will be better than the ones currently at the club.