The comment was in response to our lack of go forward, and specifically mentioned the four "recognised" props in our 17 - as opposed to the partimers who might fill in that position (Hindy, Tautai).
Based on my observation at the game (don't have it to review on Fox etc) The timings when Poore, Moimoi, Mannah and Allgood were all on the bench from at least half time until after the first SOuths try of the second half (about 50th minute?).
Regardless of how he's attempting to use an additional two second rowers in a six-man prop rotation, to not have even one of your four first choice props on the field at a crucial time for go forward is abysmal tactics imo. Most other teams/coaches can get by with a very simple four man prop rotation, and so could we - but Kearney tries to over complicate things, the players seem confused on the field, and the whole thing backfires.
Bullshit. The problem with you (and several others here) is that you pay more attention to a poster's name than the content they've posted, and get carried away with your own generalisations about the poster and start off with personal comments like the above rather than having the intelligent discussion. The reactions from some would be very different if I posted the same points under a different forum name, but I digress.
And/or a coach that drill it into the team during training each week. What the f do they spend their time doing the other four days of their working weeks - it sure as hell looks like they aren't training together or getting any structures or tactics right for gamedays?
