Lambretta
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,689
So the first troll sets up a troll free thread.
If payments had no effect, why did they have to pay over the cap in the first place?
It's a great question and a valid one mate.
However, payments over the odds had no effect building the team, rather it was retention of players and fear of future failure which forced them over the salary cap.
Ergo: They didn't spend big to attract other clubs players, but when they coached and developed a player into a top player they wanted to pay extra to retain them. So yes, they "cheated" under the current rules.
Personally though I think the rules are disgracefully unfair in the first place but that's not what is being discussed here.
On topic, I think the Melbourne Storm have shown themselves that they actually didnt NEED to cheat the salary cap. They probably would have been successful without paying all the additional money. They were stupidly driven by fear to do it and it cost the club and its supporters dearly.
I hope they go on and win the comp fairly with the team they have this season.