What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Moi Moi GORN

Morenito

Juniors
Messages
1,700
effnic said:
Good to see he deserves every single week he gets maybe more pathetic cheap shot and after all parra are good at anything with the word cheap in it.

Even though i dont understand what your trying to say...

YOUR AN IDIOT!
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
mickdo said:
Quite frankly, I don't care. This year we have been dudded twice by the judiciary with Dunley getting off scott free and cat Barrett getting a measley week for disgraceful indescretions. If Fui gets off then IMO it's just a case of what goes around comes around, and the judiciary's shockingly unbalanced scales of justice finally leaning our way.

Yeah I'd go along with that - others get off on technicalities and bullsh*t stories - lets use that defence.

I believe he hit him -but I don't believe it was as hard as it might appear....I think Barnes got the stuffing knocked out of him in that tackle more cos Fui ended up landing on him as they hit the ground than his clip on the head.

Plus Barnes was up setting up Thaiday's try just minutes after this hit - so it can't have done him too much damage.
 

N.Hindmarsh_Fan

Juniors
Messages
1,612
effnic said:
Morenito can you understand this: Your a nob. geez you parra fans are really that stupid how could you not read whats clearly infront of you.

Mate, I am an ethnic and people like you give people like me a bad name, go bury your head in the sand you dope. Stop trolling, go to your pathetic excuse for a forum and talk with the three other people that communicate in there.
 

Morenito

Juniors
Messages
1,700
effnic said:
Good to see he deserves every single week he gets maybe more pathetic cheap shot and after all parra are good at anything with the word cheap in it.[/QUOTE]

How about some breathing!

You can do that with full stops and commas otherwise nothing will make any sense because you keep talking and do more talking and then after that you do even more talking without stoping and nothing makes any sense you dumb-merkin.

Go to sleep. You got school tomorrow
 

Macca_

Coach
Messages
18,629
lucablight said:
I think we can pretty much agree that we have good depth. I'm just saying that even in having depth by losing our top 17 we still lose out in terms of ability and skill. Perhaps not as much as other clubs but we still do.
Obviously if you lose your top 17 you lose out in terms of ability and skill.... Your saying depth is a word that is overused. But now you agree we have it. Our depth would be oone of the best in the comp. As I said, 2 minor premierships and 3rd in flegg.

As for Fui, well he is replaceable. I mentioned about who out of last weeks 17 anyone would handle loosing. Somebody posted the 8-17. Fui is nearly the only one. Cannings or Peek will step up. Fui is rated higher than he should be IMO.

And yes, we can agree to disagree :D
 

ParraDude_Jay

First Grade
Messages
6,160
Macca_ said:
As for Fui, well he is replaceable.

No offence... but that's one of the worst comments I've heard on this forum.

How is he replaceable? Adam Peek's only good when defending, he makes no metres, and Cannings is even worse, easily our softest foward.

Fuifui makes so many metres from the bench, he runs at the line like he doesn't know there are people there ready to smash him, but he doesn't care. He's pretty quick for a prop and he's intimidating, who else fits this description at our club (who has made a first grade debut of course)?

Fui is very underrated, we're going to really miss him if he can't appeal and get off this charge.
 

Macca_

Coach
Messages
18,629
ParraDude_Jay said:
No offence... but that's one of the worst comments I've heard on this forum.

How is he replaceable? Adam Peek's only good when defending, he makes no metres, and Cannings is even worse, easily our softest foward.
None taking. It's just an opinion.

Peek and Cannings will step up when needed. You seem to under rate them. No offence but that's one of the worst comments I've read on this forum.

Fui is replaceable. Once again IMO.
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
ParraDude_Jay said:
No offence... but that's one of the worst comments I've heard on this forum.

How is he replaceable? Adam Peek's only good when defending, he makes no metres, and Cannings is even worse, easily our softest foward.

Fuifui makes so many metres from the bench, he runs at the line like he doesn't know there are people there ready to smash him, but he doesn't care. He's pretty quick for a prop and he's intimidating, who else fits this description at our club (who has made a first grade debut of course)?

Fui is very underrated, we're going to really miss him if he can't appeal and get off this charge.

I agree, he is a great asset to our side and will be missed. Although, I think Peek can step up.
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Fui missed the middle of the season after being suspended against the Sharks. We did pretty well without him then. He will me missed but he isn't at the Hindy level yet.....

Peek and Cannings will do the job they have to....
 

fish eel

Immortal
Messages
42,876
I think people are being a bit tough on Aaron Cannings.

His form was pretty solid and he was playing some decent footy. Obviously, in comparison to Fui, his form would look pretty weak, as would most front rowers in the NRL!

He'll get the job done.
 

Macca_

Coach
Messages
18,629
My thoughts on Fui being replaceable have been turned from a mole hill into a mountain.

I hope they appeal. I'd love to see him get off and play Sunday. The guy has been playing good footy. My point is that he is one guy in our 17 that can be replaced. When you look at them all, there are a lot of other guys that we'd be more worried about loosing.

I'm not saying he is a bad player and doesn't deserve to be in the team. I'm saying that he is one we can replace. And it's just an opinion.

As Colonel correctly said, he wasn't there for a big part of the season and we handled things then. Cannings will step up to the plate. That I'm sure of.
 

Nickeel

Juniors
Messages
2,372
I think one thing we can all agree on is that Fuifui is appealing. Both on the field and now off it. :lol:

Nick
 

mickdo

Coach
Messages
17,355
The Colonel said:
Fui missed the middle of the season after being suspended against the Sharks. We did pretty well without him then. He will me missed but he isn't at the Hindy level yet.....
There's the clincher. Case closed.
 

Kornstar

Coach
Messages
15,578
Fui did not play against Canberra (the first time) and Newcastle, he may have made a difference in those games, he may not, i am of the belief though that he would have made a huge difference, both those games were there for the taking, his impact would have been huge!!!
 

ParraDude_Jay

First Grade
Messages
6,160
Macca_ said:
Cannings will step up to the plate. That I'm sure of.

Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I think the proof is in the pudding with Cannings. He's been a major disappointment and really isn't fit to lace Fui's boots at the moment. He doesn't run hard, he doesn't tackle hard, and he doesn't offload enough to make up for it. Plus the line "Watch Cannings step up this week, he'll grab this opportunity with both hands" has been used too many times by everyone, although I sincerely hopes he comes through this time.

The loss of Fui is being underestimated, his running brought us back into that game against the Dragons, he lifts the whole team. I would love to say the same about Peek or Cannings, but I'd be lying. Peek will do a job, but he can't inspire the team back into a game because he's just a toiler. Cannings could, but he never does and probably never will. If we were to be 12 - 0 down in a grand final, I'd look to Fui to bring us back into it, but we can't now and we could be in some trouble.
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
ParraDude_Jay said:
Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I think the proof is in the pudding with Cannings. He's been a major disappointment and really isn't fit to lace Fui's boots at the moment. He doesn't run hard, he doesn't tackle hard, and he doesn't offload enough to make up for it. Plus the line "Watch Cannings step up this week, he'll grab this opportunity with both hands" has been used too many times by everyone, although I sincerely hopes he comes through this time.

The loss of Fui is being underestimated, his running brought us back into that game against the Dragons, he lifts the whole team. I would love to say the same about Peek or Cannings, but I'd be lying. Peek will do a job, but he can't inspire the team back into a game because he's just a toiler. Cannings could, but he never does and probably never will. If we were to be 12 - 0 down in a grand final, I'd look to Fui to bring us back into it, but we can't now and we could be in some trouble.

I think you are over estimating Fui's importance to the side. He has missed the bulk of the season through two suspensions - one against the Bunnies early on and then against the Sharks. Sure he has performed more than admirably in a lot of games he has played of late but that was his job. The 11 weeks he has been out plus the next nine show that he can also be a liability.

Going into the finals, personally, I would rather a Cannings or a Peek on the field as they are unlikely to have us playing down to 12 men if Fui happened to clean up another player with an over zealous referee sending him off.

You are underestimating the ability of Peek and Cannings who did the job they were asked to do when Fui was sitting out his previous suspensions. We didn't do too badly against those teams and now it is up to the likes of either Peek and Cannings to stand up and do the same thing.

It is no use worrying about what Fui brought to the field because we won't see it again this season unless if by some minor miracle they win an appeal.
 
Messages
1,471
I think u all are being very harsh on Cannings, if given the opportunity he will impress us this week, Smith only a 4-6 weeks ago said, that cannings is ready to roar , he has an awesome running game. What u may find affecting Cannings is that he loves to off load most of the times and Brian has wanted him to hold the ball as some passes have not come off.
Moi Moi is a lose but im sure as i stated in an earlier post if there was one player from 8-17 u would lose im sure moi moi and 1 or 2 others that will not affect the team (and that is with no disrepect).
 

noosa-eel

Juniors
Messages
1,170
I hope they do appeal Fui's decision.

Can someone tell me how that thug Webb got 6 weeks for intentionally hitting the cowboys player (don't forget he thought about it before hitting him) and Fui got 9 & yes I know all about Fui's priors but doesn't Webb have prior's too.
 
Messages
1,471
Colonel, 100% right anyone who thought Moi Moi was not a liabilty (tackling wise) think again, it was a matter of time till he was to appear before the tribunal. As stated it better than being in a play off with 12 men
 

Mr Saab

Referee
Messages
27,762
noosa-eel said:
I hope they do appeal Fui's decision.

Can someone tell me how that thug Webb got 6 weeks for intentionally hitting the cowboys player (don't forget he thought about it before hitting him) and Fui got 9 & yes I know all about Fui's priors but doesn't Webb have prior's too.

i dont think webb has the priors like Fui does. Fui was hammered because of the same tackles he was suspended for earlier in the yr.
Webb has not played that much football the past 2 yrs.
Records after 3 yrs are not used against you in loading
 

Latest posts

Top