So are you saying that Dufty lost us games because of his defence? and you are saying that if we had Dugan on the field, that we would have won those games, because Dugan would have saved the tries that Dufty didn't?
I know that Dufty's defence needs improvement, but I don't remember us losing games because of his poor defence. I do however recall him winning us numerous games and I know for a fact that Dugan wouldn't have won us those games. Dufty added another dimension to our attack and he was the only back to really provide any X factor.
The reality is the Dufty's defence was only really exposed, when the rest of the team didn't defend properly.
I know that Dufty does have to make improvements to his defence, his taking of the high balls and he has to improve how he injects himself into the backline.
Dugan was injured for half of the year again, so Cronulla certainly didn't get much value for money out of their 700K a season purchase.
BTW you said that you don't believe that Dugan wanted elite fullback money. Well I say, believe what you want to then. ps I am not a bigot. lol
And another thing, it doesn't look like any other NRL clubs were interested in signing Dugan to play fullback. Do you really think that it would have been wise to sign Dugan for 700K a year to play centre for us and then him only play 14 games in the season? I don't. I don't even think it would have been wise to pay Dugan 700K a season to play centre for us, even if he played every game of the year.
So, do you think we should have paid 700K a season? and do you think we should have caved into Dugan's demands for more money? We apparently offered him 750K a season, but Dugan knocked it back and ended up signing with Cronulla for 700K.