mxlegend99
Referee
- Messages
- 23,334
He was exactly the same as Steve Turner and David Williams were when they played Origin. He had absolutely nothing at this level. Being a good or even a great club winger does not mean that you are built for Origin football.Was Merritt great? No he wasn't. But Daley himself has confirmed coming in on Inglis was the gameplan. GI is the best player in the world and when an idiot coach has a shit plan to stop him of course he'll tear you up.
Merritt was acting on orders. I doubt he'll play another game now but he has never had a fair go and he has been made to look bad by an incompetent coach.
Nathan Merritt is too small and weak for this level, and was never going to stand a chance against Greg Inglis. That is why so many people were against his selection. Greg Inglis tends to make those sort of players look like bitches. Because he is the best player in the game. But that doesn't mean that you make excuses for a player looking like his bitch.
There are blokes who are just better built to cope with it. Blake Ferguson was pretty good in Game 1. Primarily because he is a big bloke, very confident and doesn't mind playing physical football. It's also why Michael Gordon was good in his single Origin game back in 2010. He isn't built like a second rower, but he's a far stronger player then Merritt and acts as an extra forward when he plays on the wing. He is willing to put his body on the line and is very strong with great leg drive. For a tiny white fella he sure can bash his way through opposition players. Jorge Taufua and Jack Wighton are other players who would be better suited to the job needed in Origin.
That said... if Greg Inglis didn't exist or was playing for New South Wales. Those wingers who have failed miserably could probably step up to Origin and look even better then when they play club football. Because without him running at them, their weaknesses wouldn't be as obvious. With them playing outside him, their strengths would be used to their potential.