El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
Farah seemed sensitive from the get go.
that's what i thought too
bit of a blouse if those questions made him get his knickers in a knot
Farah seemed sensitive from the get go.
that's what i thought too
bit of a blouse if those questions made him get his knickers in a knot
Farah seemed sensitive from the get go.
I had no problem with the questions Johns asked Farah. These are questions that everyone is asking. For mine how Farah responded showed the pressure the Tigers are under.
What I do have a problem with is the language. I know the show has moved to a more adult time, but there is stil plenty of young kids watching.
Say what you want about Mattys questions, if Farah is gonna be that touchy in an interview, how the hell is he gonna keep a cool head on the Footy field when things aren't going his way?
Maybe bad attitudes is what's dragging the Wests down.
I don't have Fox here at my place. What exactly did Farah say and why was he pissed at Johns? Is this another case of little miss precious going way over the top?
Pretty much exactly that. Johns was very blunt with his questions and wanted clear and simple answers, which Farah didn't provide for the most part. All he did was try and turn it around on Johns.
Pretty much exactly that. Johns was very blunt with his questions and wanted clear and simple answers, which Farah didn't provide for the most part. All he did was try and turn it around on Johns.
How many times does Farah have to deny there is any infighting between him and Benji?
About time the media were held responsible for bringing up the same rumour again and again every time the tigers lose a few games
Pretty much exactly that. Johns was very blunt with his questions and wanted clear and simple answers, which Farah didn't provide for the most part. All he did was try and turn it around on Johns.
If what you mean by "try and turn it around on Johns" means "making reference to past, off-field incidents which have absolutely nothing to do with the interview or discussion", that's definitely punching below the waist and a very low blow. Typical behaviour from a person who doesn't want to accept responsibility for his poor on-field form or doesn't want to proven wrong, and then tries to feel vindicated by attacking others.