St. George are called the Dragons because of the legend of Saint George and the Dragon.
Balmain picked up the Tigers as a nickname because their colours of orange and black resemble a tiger.
Newcastle went for a medieval knight theme because of the connection to castles. They're the knights that defend the castle.
The Raiders didn't get to pick their name and almost certainly wouldn't have gone with a Viking theme if they had had more control over their brand when the club was founded. Canberra does however have an unusual amount of references to Scandinavian culture for an Australian city that may have influenced their branding or could just be a happy accident.
I could go on if you like, but the point is that most teams have a reason or rational for where their names and brands come from, and there's absolutely no rational behind calling a team from New Zealand the scorpions.
There's also plenty of potential for unique branding in NZ and dozens of better names and brands than the scorpions for a Kiwi team.
Yeah thats a great history lesson, still doesn't explain why thers no tigers in balmain, yet plenty of bees that sport that same color, or that St.george dragons were the "dragon-slayers" but over time being called the dragons seemed cooler,
Either way your explaination means shit, its a way you've worded it to make it like they intended to choose a local brand or mascot, when they didn't and don't have to.... keep on tooting your horn dane
Nz rugby can choose the hurricanes, blues, crusaders, highlanders, chiefs, but RL has to stick to a local fauna FFS please..
Ive already stated the scorpions team already exists in lower grades representing the south island, they don't have to be a local creature