What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
36,009
“New Zealand is too small to have just one team; there is plenty of talent to unearth.”

Surely nz is too big just for one team ? Lol

Super sowie what a Champion though
 

Matua

First Grade
Messages
5,272
Not sure this a great idea, isn't working that well in rugby, likely wont work in league either. Their target audience are already Warriors fans. Maybe it might work if they all wear red, they call them Mana Tonga, and they mostly Tongan (heritage) players.

TBH, if they did become a reality I'd probably support them as they're likely going to have more NZers playing for them than the Warriors.
 

İzmir Zaferi

Juniors
Messages
61
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,922
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.
Some stinky bait
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,687
With the relaunch of under 20's, which was huge for Warriors in NZ I wonder whether the NRL should actually have four teams in NZ.

Auckland, ChristChurch, Wellington, Hamilton?

Doing so would broaden the drawing.

"Sell" these teams to either the Warriors or Aussie teams (or NRL bids).

For instance, the Melbourne Storm may be interested in launching Wellington Storm as a direct feeder. Roosters in Hamilton.

They can preempt and prepare for NRL expansion and create even greater junior pathways that Union can't really match right now.

Never. It's been 30 years since warriors entered comp. Two kiwi teams will probably be limit.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
36,009
What's doing here? Crowd announced as 23k+, but large swathes of that grandstand empty, I recall that happening last year to.

Is there cashed up Kiwi fans that buy tickets, but don't bother going?
That’s your take on a crowd of 23k for a trial game when games in Sydney and qld are getting 5k

Wild !
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,922
That’s your take on a crowd of 23k for a trial game when games in Sydney and qld are getting 5k

Wild !
To be honest, NZ is just showing how poor crowds in Sydney are historically.

I mean Cairns has been underwater for weeks and still got 7k for a trial featuring QCup players.

But there clearly is a pattern of NZ announcing sell outs but not everyone turning up.
 

Latest posts

Top