Join The Bandwagon
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,042
Channel 9's coverage was absolutely abysmal.
First, they delay the football because of their 'Duty' to report on Apec during ACA, when in fact they ran stories focusing of Peter Brock's wife and a Ford for sale in America.
Second, I distinctly remembering Channel 9's sport boss telling Ray Hadley last week that they would run the game as if it was live. He said it would include add breaks consisting of 1 add (as per their usual live coverage) after stoppages. The first add they did this, but the very next add went for 3 minutes as did all others.
Third, when 9 left for a break in the 27th minute, they came back and it was the 35th. They realised their mistake and cut back. We all saw the score so that 10 mins of football was pointless for us to see as we knew no score would eventuate.
Shame Nine, Shame!
Also, was it just me or did they run 3 adds during a 10-15 minute period?
First, they delay the football because of their 'Duty' to report on Apec during ACA, when in fact they ran stories focusing of Peter Brock's wife and a Ford for sale in America.
Second, I distinctly remembering Channel 9's sport boss telling Ray Hadley last week that they would run the game as if it was live. He said it would include add breaks consisting of 1 add (as per their usual live coverage) after stoppages. The first add they did this, but the very next add went for 3 minutes as did all others.
Third, when 9 left for a break in the 27th minute, they came back and it was the 35th. They realised their mistake and cut back. We all saw the score so that 10 mins of football was pointless for us to see as we knew no score would eventuate.
Shame Nine, Shame!
Also, was it just me or did they run 3 adds during a 10-15 minute period?