What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL posts $46m profit for 2018

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
The government no doubt provided assistance for AFL stadiums but the AFL was also able to find the $200m needed to purchase the stadium before the scheduled buy out in 2025. The NRL could do worse than starting to build a warchest to have greater economic clout in dictating infrastructure and operations for the game, on top of improved government relationships.
The trouble is that 2018 being the first year of the TV deal, the NRL pays less in costs, mainly club grants, than in later years as the salary cap increases but TV money doesn't. It would give a more accurate picture in their case to see a 5 year balance sheet.
 

Frailty

First Grade
Messages
9,456
The trouble is that 2018 being the first year of the TV deal, the NRL pays less in costs, mainly club grants, than in later years as the salary cap increases but TV money doesn't. It would give a more accurate picture in their case to see a 5 year balance sheet.

I think that is dependent on the structure of the TV Deal. We hear that a deal is worth $1.8B for the rights between 2018 and 2022 seasons, but not how that money is injected into the ARLC. Is it one lump sum at the beginning of the deal and those liquid assets are available straight away, or is it $360M per year, or is it varied amounts each year.
 

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
I think that is dependent on the structure of the TV Deal. We hear that a deal is worth $1.8B for the rights between 2018 and 2022 seasons, but not how that money is injected into the ARLC. Is it one lump sum at the beginning of the deal and those liquid assets are available straight away, or is it $360M per year, or is it varied amounts each year.
If it were one lump sum at the start, available immediately, it would be reflected in last year's numbers, wouldn't it? I suspect it is equal amounts each year but someone might know for sure.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
The government no doubt provided assistance for AFL stadiums but the AFL was also able to find the $200m needed to purchase the stadium before the scheduled buy out in 2025. The NRL could do worse than starting to build a warchest to have greater economic clout in dictating infrastructure and operations for the game, on top of improved government relationships.

Agree the NRL needs to build a warchest.
The fact the AFL had negotiated better Tv deals in the past than the NRL ,the fact the ARL used up their cash resources (some estimated at $20-25m in 1995 )to fight back the SL war,menat we are in the position we are in now.
Owning their own ground(VFL PARK) in the past helped the VFL no question.And they still were able to secure a favourable deal re Docklands.
And they were much better lobbying State and Fed Govts and ACT Govt (than the NRL)to secure quite a few decent stadiums at minimal expense to themselves.A subject I have mentioned on many posts in the past.Our lobbying under CEOs from Gallop backwards was crap.

I note also 3/5/18 state funds AFL for Etihad redevelopment ($225m) plus the Harbour Esplanade.
 
Last edited:

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
Im impressed with the NRL Digital numbers...

Nearly 1million accounts (i assume most are paying customers) not even mentioning what they can do with the data info.

Quadrupling their digital revenue in a single year would definitely siggest the big digital investment is already paying off
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,992
Im impressed with the NRL Digital numbers...

Nearly 1million accounts (i assume most are paying customers) not even mentioning what they can do with the data info.

Quadrupling their digital revenue in a single year would definitely siggest the big digital investment is already paying off
Thank god PR isn't here to find any way to take the gloss off
 

BlueandGold

Juniors
Messages
1,204
Agree the NRL needs to build a warchest.
The fact the AFL had negotiated better Tv deals in the past than the NRL ,the fact the ARL used up their cash resources (some estimated at $20-25m in 1995 )to fight back the SL war,menat we are in the position we are in now.
Owning their own ground(VFL PARK) in the past helped the VFL no question.And they still were able to secure a favourable deal re Docklands.
And they were much better lobbying State and Fed Govts and ACT Govt (than the NRL)to secure quite a few decent stadiums at minimal expense to themselves.A subject I have mentioned on many posts in the past.Our lobbying under CEOs from Gallop backwards was crap.

I note also 3/5/18 state funds AFL for Etihad redevelopment ($225m) plus the Harbour Esplanade.

Warchest currently stands at over 90m in cash reserves, It is building.
 
Messages
15,518
If that were the case, I thought it may have happened in the financial year following the incident (ie, the 2014/15 fin year)

4 years later seems a bit weird.

(Not saying you are wrong at all mate)

Don't forget though, squads used to be smaller. Its is now a 30 player squad so it would account for some increase when you consider it used to be a top 23 player squad.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Don't forget though, squads used to be smaller. Its is now a 30 player squad so it would account for some increase when you consider it used to be a top 23 player squad.
Yeah fair enough, but surely that wouldn't see insurance rises that much. 20% possibly.

It just seems to be too high to be ignored. There's gotta be something more behind that high figure. lol
 

footy75

Bench
Messages
3,014
A year after the NRL needed to seek a loan following successive financial losses, the game’s governing body has delivered a stunning turnaround to announce a $46 million profit on the back of increased broadcast, sponsorship and digital revenue.

Total consolidated revenue for the 2018 season was $499.9 million – a 40% increase from the $377m the game earned in 2017 when the NRL recorded a $3.7m net loss.

While most of the gain came from broadcast revenue of $318m, non-broadcast revenue also grew by 21% or $30.9m last year, while costs were down.

Besides the NRL’s new broadcast deal with Nine and Fox Sports, the main growth areas were sponsorship and wagering – up from $73m in 2017 to $78.9m last year – and digital revenue, which increased from $6.6m to $23.6m in 2018.

The financial growth follows increases for the game in other areas last year, including:

· Total match attendances (2.2%);

· Club memberships (5.2%);

· Australian and New Zealand television audiences (1.1%), and;

· Registered players (3.6%).

The NRL boasted the top-rating program on Australian television in 2018, with 3.52m viewers tuning in to the opening Holden State of Origin match, while the inaugural Women’s State of Origin attracted a cumulative peak audience of 919,711.

In a landmark year for women’s rugby league, the first NRLW season attracted a cumulative audience of 1.85m and matches boasted the highest average audience (67,948) of any women’s football competition in Australia last year.

With 29% of NRL matches decided by four points or less and only two competition points separating the top eight teams, crowds increased to 3,252,238 and cumulative television audiences across the Telstra Premiership rose to 116,2015,132 – vindicating the increased investment by broadcasters.

In addition, subscribers to the NRL Telstra Live Pass increased and the number of match streams grew by 89%.

More than 830,000 fans signed up for an NRL Digital account, with video on demand views increasing by 53% on the new NRL Digital network and 2.9m fans actively engaged across the NRL and NRLW social communities.

The haka tribute led by Warriors duo Jazz Tevaga and Issac Luke after teammate Roger Tuivasa-Sheck was named player of the year at the Dally M awards attracted more than 3 million views on NRL.com.

Club memberships increased to 332,996, led by Brisbane (36,420), South Sydney (29,189), Parramatta (25,145) and Melbourne (25,105).

Newcastle experienced the biggest growth, up 35% to 18,017, while nine other clubs posted record membership figures.

NRL clubs received a $65.8m increase in distribution of funds, with their annual grants rising from $8.4m in 2017 to $13.1m per club last year. The salary cap for each club’s top 30 players was $9.4m.

Besides the 42% increase in funding to clubs from $156.9m in 2017 to $222.8m last year, funding to states and affiliates rose 16% to $38.1m, while the NRL devoted $35.1m for development.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $21.7m in football spending, and reduced costs of $6m for administration, and the game, event and sponsorship departments.

https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/02/28/nrl-announces-$46-million-profit-for-2018/

Sweet. Thanks for sharing.
 

tri_colours

Juniors
Messages
1,943
Is the current grant of $13m set? , continue, based on a percentage? or will it need to be renegotiated next contract?
 
Last edited:

Exsilium

Coach
Messages
10,348
Maybe they can throw more money into player education. It could certainly do with a boost in resources.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
What sort of tax would the NRL be paying on that $46m? Are they registered as NPO?

Sporting organisations are not for profit societies ,and not subject to tax is my understanding.All surplusses to be used for the good of the game.
The only plick who should be taxed heavily is the Sloth.He is not for the good of the game.
 
Last edited:

Whip Whitaker

Juniors
Messages
808
Warchest currently stands at over 90m in cash reserves, It is building.
'
Cash reserves are pointless when inflation comes into play. It would be good if the NRL could do something with the cash reserves to gain interest on it.

I watch english soccer and Arsenal had a significant amount of cash reserves, but after new tv deals and sponsorship deals, the cash reserves now aren't really that much money.
 

BlueandGold

Juniors
Messages
1,204
'
Cash reserves are pointless when inflation comes into play. It would be good if the NRL could do something with the cash reserves to gain interest on it.

I watch english soccer and Arsenal had a significant amount of cash reserves, but after new tv deals and sponsorship deals, the cash reserves now aren't really that much money.

I would rather the NRL have cash reserves for a rainy day then borrow 280m like the AFL and have that debt hanging over our head.

Just when the economy is going to shit the last thing you want is a large debt that needs servicing every year.
 

Whip Whitaker

Juniors
Messages
808
I would rather the NRL have cash reserves for a rainy day then borrow 280m like the AFL and have that debt hanging over our head.

Just when the economy is going to shit the last thing you want is a large debt that needs servicing every year.

I think you have missed the point.
 

Diesel

Referee
Messages
23,781
I would rather the NRL have cash reserves for a rainy day then borrow 280m like the AFL and have that debt hanging over our head.

Just when the economy is going to shit the last thing you want is a large debt that needs servicing every year.
Is that $280M for the stadium or something else?
 

Latest posts

Top