Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,998
when you’re in negotiations and supposed to be an equal partner, having the other party make public announcements before agreement with yourself is a pretty strong sign of disrespect. Especially when it was done to make the players look the bad guys and greedy. worked on some eaily led on here though It would seem.
the players have never said it’s not still about the money to some smaller degree, you’re being disingenuous to claim that. Here’s what they are actually saying:
“Our claims are completely reasonable, and the biggest sticking points are non-financial. This big hold up isn’t because of the salary cap being far off, it’s a number of things the NRL isn’t even willing to talk to us about.
“I don’t know what they’ve been doing throughout the year.”
welch
the only unreasonable thing I’ve seen them ask for is a seat on the commision and I totally support the arlc saying no to this, and they should kick off the clubs and the state bodies as well!
If the cap is sorted then why not annouce it?
Clubs know they are getting $5m on top of the cap, Without the cap amount they have no idea what they are getting.
Match payments outside the cap for Magic Round and Finals is unreasonable.
The retired player fund being run by the players only, Shouldn't the NRL have a say in it? Some ex players don't deserve access to it. So the joint control of makes sense