Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,992
Isnt the deal based on % of revenue? Why would costs to relocate due to covid matter? The deal isn’t on “net” position. “interpretation” lol
So the players shouldn't wear any of the relocation costs?
Isnt the deal based on % of revenue? Why would costs to relocate due to covid matter? The deal isn’t on “net” position. “interpretation” lol
they already dId by agreeing to cut the cap for 20-22 By $50mill. The nrl announcing a significant surplus in 22 is what put the revenue % back on the agenda I’d suggest.So the players shouldn't wear any of the relocation costs?
Yeh you should blindly take their side without looking objectively at the factsWhenever I see workers pushing for better pay and conditions I always take the side of the employer.
I guess the issue here isT
they already dId by agreeing to cut the cap for 20-22 By $50mill. The nrl announcing a significant surplus in 22 is what put the revenue % back on the agenda I’d suggest.
![]()
‘Out of the game forever’: The brutal truth behind stars’ defiant stand against NRL
‘Out of the game forever’: The brutal truth behind stars’ defiant stand against NRLwww.foxsports.com.au
The fans don’t understand when they call players greedy
it’s not about the salary cap
also why do players have to have operations privately funded ? Why can’t they just access Medicare if they don’t want to pay for private health care like most people on high wages
They have a year after they retire to fix any injuryYeah Medicare. That’ll work.
will be great to see players out for 18 months while they sit on the waiting list for their ACL repair
HmmmNew committee for consultation on major game changers like rules competition structure etc compromising rlpa, refs union and nrl reps.
Hmmm
Comp structure - NRL responsibility
Rules - should be IRL responsibility but dont we already have ex player or coach on the rules committee. Should never have current player or coach
NRL reps - no such thing
I reckon they are just dirty about how the six again aswell as other interpretations of rules got ushered in so quickly mid season some years ago, so i get the frustration, but it shouldn't be so drastic with regards to rule changes anymore, and they most certainly should not be involved in creating rulesClubs, Coaches and Players should have no say in the way the NRL as a comp is run
They have a year after they retire to fix any injury
and I don’t think you can attribute an acl incurred 13 months after they retire to their past career
or as I said if they don’t want Medicare they can purchase this thing call private healthcare
I'm willing to bet most of the folks criticising the players would be screaming blue murder if their own employers pushed ahead with critical reforms or changes at their workplace without an EBA...
I reckon they are just dirty about how the six again aswell as other interpretations of rules got ushered in so quickly mid season some years ago, so i get the frustration, but it shouldn't be so drastic with regards to rule changes anymore, and they most certainly should not be involved in creating rules
My last knee reco I was still pretty much 8-10k out of pocket with private health when you included scans, excess, surgeons gap, physio gap, and all that shit.
God forbid blokes who bash themselves to pieces for your entertainment every week want some sort of access to assistance for issues after their career. I'd imagine the ongoing costs for something like neck or back surgery, or anything to do with CTE or brain issues, are a hell of a lot higher