MugaB
Coach
- Messages
- 15,384
I’m sure pistol Pete will make sure they dont catch a cold!Of course 9 and fox are pi$#ed off, they've lost a large part of thier content through no fault of thier own.
Give it a week or 2 and Fox and 9 will be negotiating a reduced deal like they did in Covid.
Has the player performance increased by 80%? If not, then maybe the part of the business responsible should get the bulk of the increase.
Players are taking the piss.
It's a good point, I'm not sure what other sports do. I do share the concern of the NRL though, they want to pour money into funds that are actually going to make a difference, they don't want to turn around in 10 years and see it get pissed up against the wallId want to see what is the norm in other equivalent level sports. I know some sports the PA controls the funds, invests them, dishes them out etc etc. The players would argue their money, their control I'd suggest.
While players are importantHow much of the tv deal do you think the NRL would get without the players? The players are the product, they are the ones responsible for the increase.
its the players money, its up to them. Like the clubs. I dont see the NRL wanting to control how the clubs are spending the $290mil a year they are getting from the NRL? I can see why the players are pssed that the NRL doesnt trust them with their own money, its very paternalistic.It's a good point, I'm not sure what other sports do. I do share the concern of the NRL though, they want to pour money into funds that are actually going to make a difference, they don't want to turn around in 10 years and see it get pissed up against the wall
But it very much is Christian....
It’s not about the money
In the AFL the PA is given the money and left to control it.How does afl managed to sort out its cba and club funding without threats of strikes or super league
I suspect their stakeholders have a greater sense of responsibility to their game
annoying media rights holders as we are trying to negotiate our next tv deal isn’t the smartest thing the players could be doing
Admin should be admining... the players are being paid, yet they want control over all of it.. ffs how are not getting this... what business lets the workers decide on the accounting structure of said business...its the players money, its up to them. Like the clubs. I dont see the NRL wanting to control how the clubs are spending the $290mil a year they are getting from the NRL? I can see why the players are pssed that the NRL doesnt trust them with their own money, its very paternalistic.
What business pays it staff then dictates to staff how they spend their money? End of the day this is the players entitlements and money and they should decide how it is managed. If they want NRL to control it fine, but sounds like they want their representative body to control it, which is also fine BECAUSE ITS THEIR MONEY.Admin should be admining... the players are being paid, yet they want control over all of it.. ffs how are not getting this... what business lets the workers decide on the accounting structure of said business...
They want all these funds for retired players and injuries, yet cant pay their own medical
Agree on the money to the clubs, not how it is spent but at least have some KPI's tied to it. Re: the players, I could be wrong, but aren't we talking about funds the NRL is investing in? I would want to make sure it's properly invested too.its the players money, its up to them. Like the clubs. I dont see the NRL wanting to control how the clubs are spending the $290mil a year they are getting from the NRL? I can see why the players are pssed that the NRL doesnt trust them with their own money, its very paternalistic.
Admin should be admining... the players are being paid, yet they want control over all of it.. ffs how are not getting this... what business lets the workers decide on the accounting structure of said business...
They want all these funds for retired players and injuries, yet cant pay their own medical
What business pays it staff then dictates to staff how they spend their money? End of the day this is the players entitlements and money and they should decide how it is managed. If they want NRL to control it fine, but sounds like they want their representative body to control it, which is also fine BECAUSE ITS THEIR MONEY.
No we are talking about the players entitlements they have negotiated and is their money. The NRL isnt "investing' in anything any more than the Ch9 BS when they were spouting about how much they'd "invested" in the game that they felt had been wasted.Agree on the money to the clubs, not how it is spent but at least have some KPI's tied to it. Re: the players,
I could be wrong, but aren't we talking about funds the NRL is investing in? I would want to make sure it's properly invested too.
Ok, if that's the case then fair enoughNo we are talking about the players entitlements they have negotiated and is their money. The NRL isnt "investing' in anything any more than the Ch9 BS when they were spouting about how much they'd "invested" in the game that they felt had been wasted.
Your employer doesn't dictate to you which superann fund they will contribute your money into, this is no different.
The players have 50% of control over their retirement benefits in the NFL. Why should the NRL players not get the same?