NRL360

[mozza91]

It’s ridiculous. I can accept it if it’s a former League player fighting but when it has literally no link to the game there’s no reason to promote it.

 

[This Year?]

NRL360 in summary:
Talk up the Roosters.
Criticise the Tigers.
Rinse.
Repeat.

 

[Perth Red]

Were only a week in and its already boring as batsht discussing the same things with the same news ltd talking heads

 

[ColdWetPanther]

Kenty wants to know why Seibold is a first grade coach in front of his mate Shane Flanagan.

Well despite Seibold ‘wetting the bed at Brisbane’, at least he isn’t a f@cking cheat like Flanno….

 

[Perth Red]

That was awkward wansnt it, clearly hates seibold, clearly got a hard on for druggie salary cap cheating flanno!

 

[KennySterling]

Quite sickening, actually, the way that Fox have welcome 'Flanno' into their broadcasting 'family'.
I wouldn't trust the guy as far as I could throw him and as a commentator he sucks.
Kent & his ilk have no shame, nor ethics or standards, given the way they push him endlessly.

 

[This Year?]

Dragons turn to cop it this week as well as the Tigers.
You could set a clock to it.

 

[Perth Red]

Dragons turn to cop it this week instead of the Tigers.
You could set a clock to it.

Nah they went back to the fried and tested tigers tonight lol

 

[This Year?]

Nah they went back to the fried and tested tigers tonight lol

Yeah I'm just watching it now. Had to edit my post.

 

[ColdWetPanther]

Yeah I'm just watching it now. Had to edit my post.

Surely not having a go at the Saints; one of Kenty’s mates is in charge.

 

[This Year?]

Surely not having a go at the Saints; one of Kenty’s mates is in charge.

Blaming management for not renewing his contract and daring to try the open market.

If it was the Roosters they'd be calling it smart and doing due diligence.

 

[Front-Rower]

Anasta looks like he has worked on the tan over the summer. Also looks like he has had some work done, or Botox or both.

 

[Showtime]

What club was Kent referring to when he said that a player manager will have significant influence on a particular club due to the amount of players he has on the books? Mentioned the coach was also managed by the same guy.

 

[Wb1234]

What club was Kent referring to when he said that a player manager will have significant influence on a particular club due to the amount of players he has on the books? Mentioned the coach was also managed by the same guy.

Knights ? He’s talking about Isaac Moses

 

[Perth Red]

Poor old Braith was squirming with all the talk of booting player managers lol

 

[mozza91]

I listen to Cronk on 360 and the podcast with Matty Johns and he’s smart, insightful and pretty much always on the mark.
Switch to game day and the merkin forgets what sentences are and talks garbage non stop.

 

[KennySterling]

Kent & Rothfield rightly get a bagging but watching the creepy, odious Brent Read tonight as they discussed Suaali'is 'defection' made me sick. He ought to stick to soccer.

 

[The Mad Hatter]

Poor old Braith was squirming with all the talk of booting player managers lol

The merkins should be putting up their conflict of interests.

I can handle ex player biases like Sterlo or Fatty or Blocker when they were talking about Para, Manly or Balmain/Wests Tigers…

However, when you’re on the coaching staff, the board or a player manager, it should always be put up on screen or eliminate conflict of interests. Especially when they crap on about decisions and for example Brandy gets pissy about a refs decision against Penrith.
Someone mentioned about Braith being a player manager. I was sitting with in-laws who had no idea he was one. Most people probably don’t. It certainly affects the conversation.

You can’t eliminate biases but they certainly should be putting it at the bottom of the screen or saying so.

Furthermore, the amount of guys who do radio, newspaper and tv has certainly minimised the diversity of opinion and as such, allows for agendas or rumour/innuendo to go around and around to the point I feel NRL360 feeds off the newspaper reports that they’ve written and they can then just fabricate debate or ire.

The public then buy in to it and the NRL or coaches/players get screwed.

 

[KennySterling]

The merkins should be putting up their conflict of interests.

I can handle ex player biases like Sterlo or Fatty or Blocker when they were talking about Para, Manly or Balmain/Wests Tigers…

However, when you’re on the coaching staff, the board or a player manager, it should always be put up on screen or eliminate conflict of interests. Especially when they crap on about decisions and for example Brandy gets pissy about a refs decision against Penrith.
Someone mentioned about Braith being a player manager. I was sitting with in-laws who had no idea he was one. Most people probably don’t. It certainly affects the conversation.

You can’t eliminate biases but they certainly should be putting it at the bottom of the screen or saying so.

Furthermore, the amount of guys who do radio, newspaper and tv has certainly minimised the diversity of opinion and as such, allows for agendas or rumour/innuendo to go around and around to the point I feel NRL360 feeds off the newspaper reports that they’ve written and they can then just fabricate debate or ire.

The public then buy in to it and the NRL or coaches/players get screwed.

Couldn't agree more. Anasta is like the grinning elephant in the room when talk is about contracts and player managers. The public needs to know the agenda. It's about context.

 

[RedVee_8]

What about this pick Suaali’i “we’re bigger than that as a game now”.
IMO that’s BS.

He has chosen to leave why reward him with origin selection and paydays?