Santino Patane
Juniors
- Messages
- 296
I get why you are reacting the way you are, but sorry champ, Sydney is not the comp- it’s the NATIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE. Without the other teams, it would be nowhere near as strong or as popular as it is. To highlight this, Sydney teams have won 12 NRL Premierships, non Sydney has won 11. What would the comp be without the great runs of Canberra, Brisbane, Newcastle and Melbourne over the last 30 years? If anything, these teams define the best of League more than anyone else.Same could be said for the Qcup growing out of the BRL, i mean why isn't there 2 or 3 PNG teams by now, and brisbane has 6 teams there, thts too much.... its dug into your brain this stupid idea that there are limitations, and that sydney clubs hold back the whole competition.... they ARE the Competition, and the interstate teams had been invited into it, same as AFL, so please fück up, and go to the AFL thread and spill you Büllshit there, no one team is relocating, unless they choose to, and AFL has 3 cat themed teams, who cares... no wonder the NRL don't want a Logan based team, there all morons
Your little reaction to a view that you disagree with just reinforces the negative perception of Sydneysiders in general. Calling all of Logan morons is just like saying all Westies (especially Penrith) are Commodore driving, wife beating, toothless bogans that can’t spell correctly even with auto-correct. So please chill out mate.
For what it’s worth, I do agree that the game needs Sydney to be strong and it is a (not “the”) core of rugby league. I’ve even been convinced that no teams should be forcibly relocated or merged. The comp as it is today is the one we have to work with. Preserving is just as important as expanding- the two go hand in hand to keep our game viable into the future.