Fahey is saying one thing and the AFL and ASADA another. Don't you agree?Sorry mate, but you are just delusional.
Last edited:
Fahey is saying one thing and the AFL and ASADA another. Don't you agree?Sorry mate, but you are just delusional.
Sorry mate, but you are just delusional.
Faheis saying one thing and the AFL and ASADA another. Don't you agree?
Fahey is saying one thing and the AFL and ASADA another. Don't you agree?
Sorry mate, but you are just delusional.
ASADA's investigation cannot be completed without testimony from Stephen Dank
Mark Robinson
Herald Sun
July 03, 2013 10:00PM
TO paraphrase Superman's famous words: This looks like a fight for truth, justice and the AFL's way.
The AFL wants the Essendon drugs investigation completed by August, presumably so it can act - if it has to - before the Bombers embark on a September campaign.
ASADA works hand in hand with the AFL on this one, so we can presume again it is on board.
But how can the investigation be completed without testimony from the man at the very heart of its happenings - Stephen Dank?
New federal laws, passed last week, allow ASADA to compel persons of interest to appear and answer questions, and more importantly, produce relevant documents.
ASADA has the power to compel Dank to appear. Or it will, when the law comes into effect early next month.
Dank has said he won't appear, and has threatened legal action if he is summoned.
In the meantime, the AFL says it wants the investigation wrapped in a bow by August.
So much for the exhaustive search for truth in one of the biggest scandals in football history.
Surely, Dank's evidence is crucial.
This investigation cannot be properly completed until he speaks.
If it drags into court for a determination, then so be it.
We need to see his documentation, specifically a claimed email from the World Anti-Doping Agency.
We need him to detail what he administered to the players, and who knew about it, and whatever else that can shed light on this drugs debacle.
If completed before Dank speaks, then it is not a completed investigation.
World anti-doping figures are at pains to explain that the brief of evidence built to catch Lance Armstrong took years to collate.
We love our game, but its integrity cannot be tarnished because the AFL wants it completed before finals start.
The new law already has hit its first hurdle.
Dank has given it two fingers.
"They (ASADA) have been trying to manipulate an outcome with a Federal Government and then expect full co-operation when they have completely disregarded the entire process," Dank said at the weekend.
"The way it has been handled shows no regard for truth - only for outcome."
There's irony for you.
Dank says there's no regard for truth, but at the same time won't help discover the truth.
As for ASADA, surely you can't ask for greater powers, receive them, and then not use them for its own integrity.
Doping is the axis of evil in sport, and the AFL shouldn't worry about when the investigation is completed, or worry about Essendon playing finals or, heaven forbid, winning the Grand Final.
If the Bombers saluting in September is the-worst case scenario, that can be dealt with later.
No, the AFL should concern itself with proper process and diligence in collecting all evidence.
Without Dank, it's a compromised investigation.
Second line of the article says the AFL want it all completed by August (i.e. 31 July at the latest). Seeing as though that was yesterday they haven't got the timeframe they wanted
So it won't be public until at least a fortnight after the AFL wanted.
then how come AFL journos agree with me?
http://www.news.com.au/sport/asadas...rom-stephen-dank/story-fnect155-1226673951735
you aren't understanding
it won't be public but as of tomorrow it will be completed exactly like the AFL wanted
But, but, but
Given the lack of support ASADA has received from The Sharks (and they've had their own reasons for that), ASADA have been able to focus most of their attention and resources on the AFL. So doesn't it stand to reason that the AFL investigation would be finished well in advance of the NRL investigation?
After watching the AFL story last night, the comment that intrigued me was: that Alex D (AFL CEO) was currently in New York with McGuire (Collingwood Pres) and, I think, the presidents of Western Bulldogs and St Kilda. None of the panel seemed interested as to why.
I thought WTF, what is this really all about - so late in the season and on the supposed verge of the release of AFL/ASADA report. Maybe, there might be more to this then four middle aged blokes going on a holiday together.
Any ideas? Future planning for the AFL without the bombers, maybe.
After watching the AFL story last night, the comment that intrigued me was: that Alex D (AFL CEO) was currently in New York with McGuire (Collingwood Pres) and, I think, the presidents of Western Bulldogs and St Kilda. None of the panel seemed interested as to why.
I thought WTF, what is this really all about - so late in the season and on the supposed verge of the release of AFL/ASADA report. Maybe, there might be more to this then four middle aged blokes going on a holiday together.
Any ideas? Future planning for the AFL without the bombers, maybe.
After watching the AFL story last night, the comment that intrigued me was: that Alex D (AFL CEO) was currently in New York with McGuire (Collingwood Pres) and, I think, the presidents of Western Bulldogs and St Kilda. None of the panel seemed interested as to why.
I thought WTF, what is this really all about - so late in the season and on the supposed verge of the release of AFL/ASADA report. Maybe, there might be more to this then four middle aged blokes going on a holiday together.
Any ideas? Future planning for the AFL without the bombers, maybe.
yup
you got owned
the investigation is half arsed and even the biased Victorians say that
a fact finding mission
Roy Masters said earlier this year he could have saved them the money http://www.smh.com.au/sport/us-mode...ter-a-bigger-slice-of-pie-20130531-2nh96.html
After watching the AFL story last night, the comment that intrigued me was: that Alex D (AFL CEO) was currently in New York with McGuire (Collingwood Pres) and, I think, the presidents of Western Bulldogs and St Kilda. None of the panel seemed interested as to why.
I thought WTF, what is this really all about - so late in the season and on the supposed verge of the release of AFL/ASADA report. Maybe, there might be more to this then four middle aged blokes going on a holiday together.
Any ideas? Future planning for the AFL without the bombers, maybe.