Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Weren't you telling us that it had nothing to do with the WEF before? And the heads of state have mentioned a reset, and mostly with the excuse of covid, which of course doesn't make any sense. If ridiculously wealthy people get together and try to reorganise the world, as they do, you can bet that it's not a nice idea at all.
Yes a couple have, build back better, it's an attractive statement, but let's instead look at what they did, which was to prop up capital. Maybe by "build back better" they meant go full neo liberal? 'Cause the results certainly don't point to anything but the transference of wealth upwards faster than any other time in modern history
The underlying sentiment was to re-adjust the balance between capital and people in order to create more equity. Like I said, a nice idea. Though if you include the qualification that follows that and you can see I'm a long way there from even beginning to claim such an outcome likely, in fact quite the opposite.
Why the need for programs such as Young Global Leaders if it was all going to happen anyway? There's more than a couple that were saying BBB, including one of our own pollies. It's really not so catchy that it catches on all over the place so fast. Conspiracies happen all the time, and yes, some of them are 'grand'. It wasn't an accident that the food pyramid came about and got it 180° wrong. Yet people still believe in it even though it's very easy to show that it's garbage.
How would you know it's not nefarious? They have a remarkable strike rate of getting people into positions of power in many countries. Obviously to influence and further their agenda. I don't want my leaders even affiliated with mega rich people, much less in their pocket and/or indoctrinated.
The point I'm making is that you're presenting that as if it is evidence of something nefarious, when in and of it's self it's no such thing.
Well I wasn't but I believe it is. I think it's fair to say that the agendas of super wealthy people are inherently nefarious. And it's 'itself', not two different words. Not meaning to be a smart arse.
Glad we agree.
