- Messages
- 44,980
P.s m8, there was no reinterpretation. You literally concluded with that in an initial post.
Well no, you are either lying or a dumb merkin, I don't care which
Again, here's what I posted.........
The housing shortage isn't a shortage of housing, it's a shortage of affordable housing
Meaning quite literally that the issue is not there there ain't enough housing, but that it is that isn't enough affordable housing.
Your take.................
You literally said a few pages back that there was not an availability problem of housing only affordability,
My reply...
No I didn't, I explained it. I can't help it that you fail to grasp simple concepts.
It's in English mate, I very clearly said there is a shortage of affordable housing, now stay with me here goldfish boy 'cause I'll explain it in very simple language...
People need housing, housing they can't afford isn't much good to them because it's not sustainable.
Therefore people need "Affordable Housing"
If there is a shortage of affordable housing, then it follows that there isn't enough affordable housing available. It doesn't matter how much non affordable housing there is, because it's not affordable
If there isn't enough Affordable housing available, then that would be "an availability problem of housing" no?
So clearly I did not "literally" say it's not an availability problem because the words I used to say what I said mean there is an availability problem.
Ergo when I said what I said, I quite clearly did not say what you claimed I said. So when you said that I said that what I said was wrong, you were wrong, because as I said, I never said what you said I said.
Follow SipsSemen?