The longer Hook has been with us, the more I have come understand (or at least, theorise, because I cannot be certain) why Gould hired him. I think his strength is in developing junior players into strong first graders (as well as discipline, fitness and defence, which are probably all related together).
Hook refers to Penrith, from time to time, as a ‘development club’, and that is exactly what we are. Due to the TPA system we can’t compete with a club like the Roosters and simply purchase a star studded roster in order to be competitive and win titles.
If we are ever to be a shot of winning a premiership with the way the NRL is currently structured our only hope is to develop our best juniors into star first graders and keep them at the club during the period when they are signed with us for less than their true market value (or have them desire to stay with us for less than their true market value). We are best placed to do this because we have such a huge junior base to draw from compared to other clubs. In other words, it is in this area where we can actually have an advantage over other clubs.
However, in order to execute on that strategy we need a coach who excels at converting the best of our junior players into excellent first graders. That needs to be the coach,s strenth above all else, and I think that is where Hook’s strength absolutely lies. Look at how well our young guys have been debuting, developing and starting to excel under him. It is plainly evident that he is doing an excellent job in this area.
He might not be good at everything, such as coaching attack, but who cares if other staff get involved to handle that? Does anyone think Bellamy at the Storm achieved what he has achieved all on his own - absolutely not - look at the number of people in the coaches box with him every game (in fact, you can see, even on the Storm website, the number of coaching staff the Storm has is enormous)