What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Eels could be out of pocket more than $500,000 from court case

Messages
17,663
Agree. The merkin walked out on us, based on some dodgy clause that Spags allowed him.

Sounds like he had a walk-away-at-any-time clause AND it gave him a payout. :crazy:

Greatest signing since Jack Gibson. Onya Spags. :roll:

If we end up Paying out for Bentley, who's going to wear the blame? Half a million bucks!!!...someone's got to be accountable!! I hope we win the case as it looks as though we are not doing that great financially since Bentley and Spags left. We cannot afford to lose 500k!! Let's hope the plumber got his info right before he sacked Bentley....
 
Last edited:

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,938
Roy Spagnolo: The bonuses, the beat-up car and the beer coaster

Date November 1, 2013
Chris Barrett



the-20Star-20of-20the-20Sea-20apartments-20in-20Terrigal-20131031232943256141-620x349.jpg


Roy Spagnolo was cast out by Parramatta after being accused of more than 30 instances of financial impropriety, from procuring free memberships and travel for family and friends, improperly paying large bonuses to executives and even allegedly using the back of a beer coaster to bill the club $30,000 for a Christmas party held at his house.
The former Eels chairman was banned from holding a directorship at Parramatta for two years after fronting the board this week.
the-20Star-20of-20the-20Sea-20apartments-20in-20Terrigal-20131031232906269496-620x349.jpg

The Star of the Sea apartments in Terrigal. Photo: Supplied

On Thursday, NSW Hospitality Minister George Souris said the Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing would investigate the contents of a 900-page report into the management practices of the former Parramatta Leagues Club administration and could refer matters to NSW police.
Advertisement
Spagnolo, who was defeated at the club election in May, features heavily in the audit, conducted by Russell Corporate Advisory.
The firm's findings included a series of allegations that were then put to Spagnolo, who owns an accountancy business, in a show-cause letter before his appearance before the board.


Spagnolo denied any wrongdoing on Thursday and said he had no intention of vacating the chairmanship of the Eels' junior body, the Parramatta District Rugby League Club. When contacted by Fairfax Media he said he believed he had been reprimanded by the board for ''two administration errors''. ''There is just no impropriety. I haven't done anything wrong and I'm not going anywhere,'' he said.
Among the claims are that he authorised the issue, without payment, of at least 78 memberships, including 13 in the Spagnolo family name prior to the PDRC elections in December 2012, at which he was re-elected chairman.
It is also alleged that similar issuing of free memberships - understood to be season-ticket packages - was conducted in 2010 and 2011, at a cost of as much as $22,000 to the Eels. Despite not being financial members, those people crucially gained voting rights at the election, it is claimed.


Spagnolo denies the allegations, saying the memberships were related to ''sponsorships and gratuity payments''.
Spagnolo was also accused of authorising without proper approval a $92,998 bonus to then Leagues Club chief executive Bob Bentley in May, signing off on the payment after he had failed to regain the chairmanship or a spot on the board at the PLC election that month.
It was further alleged he had earlier handed another bonus of $20,000 to Bentley in February without approval and of giving Bentley a pay increase in October 2012 without it being ticked off by the board as is required in the Registered Clubs Act.
Bentley, who was sacked by Steve Sharp's new board in July, was on a contract that contained no key performance indicators and had a clause that gave him 15 months' pay if it was terminated. The report found that Bentley directed a payroll staff member in November last year to increase his salary because Spagnolo had approved it.
Bentley's contract was signed off by Spagnolo and former board member Sid Kelly and it is claimed the terms of the deal were not made clear to Kelly.
Spagnolo says the pay rise and bonuses were contractual, and that the bonus was issued by him to Bentley after he had lost at the election because ''I hadn't paid it earlier, that's all''.

Attempts to contact Bentley yesterday were unsuccessful.
Spagnolo was also asked to explain allegations of improperly claiming money from the Leagues Club without formal paperwork. Fairfax Media understands a notable example is $30,000 he is said to have claimed for the cost of a Christmas party held at his house last year for players, Leagues Club staff and football club officials. It is understood the figure was recorded on the back of a beer coaster but without any details or particulars of how the money was spent.
Spagnolo disputes that he ever made a reimbursement claim on a beer coaster, saying instead that he used the back of a piece of paper to pen a handwritten invoice for $2000 for some of the party's costs - at the insistence of the board.
Spagnolo was also alleged to have incurred substantial costs to the Leagues Club on travel for himself, relatives and friends, including at least two stays at the Star of the Sea apartments in Terrigal in 2011.
It was claimed that no details of these trips were provided in seeking reimbursement, in contravention of the Corporations Act. Spagnolo owns a unit at the complex, where a three-bedroom apartment with ocean views can be rented for $1700 a weekend. Spagnolo said the club was invoiced because players were staying at Terrigal, including in his apartment, for a player camp and that the money was not spent on accommodation for family and friends.
The Eels' suspension of Spagnolo immediately gained the attention of the state's liquor, gaming and racing regulator on Thursday. ''I am advised that the Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing's director of compliance is meeting with the independent auditor from Russell Corporate Advisory today,'' Souris said. ''The Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing [OLGR] will determine any matters which fall under its jurisdiction and any potential breaches of the Registered Clubs Act.
''Any relevant matters will be fully investigated and appropriate action taken to protect the best interests of members of the Parramatta Leagues Club. Any matters outside OLGR's jurisdiction will be referred to the relevant investigative body such as NSW Police.''
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...eer-coaster-20131031-2wm0v.html#ixzz316PTJ1SD
 
Last edited:

Maroubra Eel

Coach
Messages
19,044
I think Jake is either related to Spagnolo or got free season ticket packages, or both.

Why are you so far up his arse Jake?
 
Messages
12,179
It is also alleged that similar issuing of free memberships - understood to be season-ticket packages - was conducted in 2010 and 2011, at a cost of as much as $22,000 to the Eels. Despite not being financial members, those people crucially gained voting rights at the election, it is claimed.


Spagnolo denies the allegations, saying the memberships were related to ''sponsorships and gratuity payments''.

gratuity or gratis?
 

Jodeci

Bench
Messages
3,513
Let's get a few facts correct here and this will be the last time I talk about this because quite frankly it's getting tired and boring of the same sh!t regarding the rubbish we continue to read. Thank god these AGM’s come around once a year.

The Season Tickets that were purchased by Roy were for 3rd party sponsors and corporates. These were sponsor commitments from prior to 2009, Being the commencement of the new Board’s tenure, and when the commitment was concluded Roy asked for these to be invoiced to the individuals. They were invoiced and subsequently paid.

The 900 page Russell Report which the newly elected board did only produced 1 thing against Roy, that Bob Bentley's bonus which as in his contract and signed by all board directors was paid after the elections and before the financial year. It was a contractual obligation and it had to be paid.

Roy was never suspended or found guilty of any wrong doings and the board reprimanded Roy without understanding the implications in the Constitution, which resulted in Roy not able to run for Board for 2 years. OLGR (Office Liquor Gaming and Racing) have gone through the 900 page report and are continuing their investigations into matters that have occurred over the last 18 months interviewing both directors and staff members of the Leagues Club.

Regarding the possible payout to Bob Bentley, why didn't the club negotiate a payout or settled this when they terminated his services rather sacking Bob and now the club has been taken to court and could put the Leagues Club out of pocket up to $550,000? If it's the same lawyer from the AGM, the club could be in a bit of strife.

Regarding the actual financials for the Leagues Club, what the overall figures don't show
you is the following:

Profit $3.8 mil. The NRL grant that each club gets was $7.1 mil up from the previous year of
$4.3 mil (that's an extra $2.7 mil). Property valuations up $1,4 mil. If the NRL gave clubs the
same grant like 2012, we actually made a loss for the first time since 2008. We can count our
lucky stars that the TV deal gives more clubs a bigger grant now.

2008: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit -$9.1 mil
2009: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit $1.1 mil
2010: NRL Grant $3.4 mil Profit $3.3 mil
2011: NRL Grant $3.6 mil Profit $5.2 mil
2012: NRL Grant $4.3 mil Profit $5.3 mil
2013: NRL Grant $7.1 mil Profit $3.3 mil

You have to give credit when it's due and Bob deserved it making $15 mil profit over those years as well as the reno's that took place.

People can sit here and whinge that they sold some units, they were instructed to do this from
the bank to reduce the debit the Leagues Club occurred in 2008.

I think Roy decided not to sue Mr Barrett from the SMH cause the article clearly showed no proof or
evidence of any misconduct and he firmly believes if the members want to believe that story
without seeking the truth, then that's their opinion and they are entitled to it. Both Glenn Jackson
and Danny Weidler both phoned Roy to retaliate but I believe he doesn't feel he needs to set the record
straight cause those who know him, know he is an honourable man.

Still to today, people like Aunty Kaye, Nathan Cayless, Luke Burt, Craig Catterick, Hayden Knowles, Wayne Beavis, Brian Smith, Nick Politis, Ray Dib and more have the ultimate respect for Roy and I've seen this with my own eyes.

Yes they may have been able to do some things better along the way, which they will probably agree, but it's a learning process and to continue seriously bagging out the bloke is getting very boring and even to the stage quite pathetic. Have a look at our renovated Club today compared to what they inherited in 2009. And there were further improvements planned.

We have a game on Monday which is much more important than this rubbish going on.
We beat the Sharks and we are back in this comp.

If we can stay within teams around 6th and 7th, we need to ensure we finish out games like the Tigers @ ANZ a few weeks back.

See u at the game.

Have a great day everyone.
 
Messages
17,663
Let's get a few facts correct here and this will be the last time I talk about this because quite frankly it's getting tired and boring of the same sh!t regarding the rubbish we continue to read. Thank god these AGM’s come around once a year.

The Season Tickets that were purchased by Roy were for 3rd party sponsors and corporates. These were sponsor commitments from prior to 2009, Being the commencement of the new Board’s tenure, and when the commitment was concluded Roy asked for these to be invoiced to the individuals. They were invoiced and subsequently paid.

The 900 page Russell Report which the newly elected board did only produced 1 thing against Roy, that Bob Bentley's bonus which as in his contract and signed by all board directors was paid after the elections and before the financial year. It was a contractual obligation and it had to be paid.

Roy was never suspended or found guilty of any wrong doings and the board reprimanded Roy without understanding the implications in the Constitution, which resulted in Roy not able to run for Board for 2 years. OLGR (Office Liquor Gaming and Racing) have gone through the 900 page report and are continuing their investigations into matters that have occurred over the last 18 months interviewing both directors and staff members of the Leagues Club.

Regarding the possible payout to Bob Bentley, why didn't the club negotiate a payout or settled this when they terminated his services rather sacking Bob and now the club has been taken to court and could put the Leagues Club out of pocket up to $550,000? If it's the same lawyer from the AGM, the club could be in a bit of strife.

Regarding the actual financials for the Leagues Club, what the overall figures don't show
you is the following:

Profit $3.8 mil. The NRL grant that each club gets was $7.1 mil up from the previous year of
$4.3 mil (that's an extra $2.7 mil). Property valuations up $1,4 mil. If the NRL gave clubs the
same grant like 2012, we actually made a loss for the first time since 2008. We can count our
lucky stars that the TV deal gives more clubs a bigger grant now.

2008: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit -$9.1 mil
2009: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit $1.1 mil
2010: NRL Grant $3.4 mil Profit $3.3 mil
2011: NRL Grant $3.6 mil Profit $5.2 mil
2012: NRL Grant $4.3 mil Profit $5.3 mil
2013: NRL Grant $7.1 mil Profit $3.3 mil

You have to give credit when it's due and Bob deserved it making $15 mil profit over those years as well as the reno's that took place.

People can sit here and whinge that they sold some units, they were instructed to do this from
the bank to reduce the debit the Leagues Club occurred in 2008.

I think Roy decided not to sue Mr Barrett from the SMH cause the article clearly showed no proof or
evidence of any misconduct and he firmly believes if the members want to believe that story
without seeking the truth, then that's their opinion and they are entitled to it. Both Glenn Jackson
and Danny Weidler both phoned Roy to retaliate but I believe he doesn't feel he needs to set the record
straight cause those who know him, know he is an honourable man.

Still to today, people like Aunty Kaye, Nathan Cayless, Luke Burt, Craig Catterick, Hayden Knowles, Wayne Beavis, Brian Smith, Nick Politis, Ray Dib and more have the ultimate respect for Roy and I've seen this with my own eyes.

Yes they may have been able to do some things better along the way, which they will probably agree, but it's a learning process and to continue seriously bagging out the bloke is getting very boring and even to the stage quite pathetic. Have a look at our renovated Club today compared to what they inherited in 2009. And there were further improvements planned.

We have a game on Monday which is much more important than this rubbish going on.
We beat the Sharks and we are back in this comp.

If we can stay within teams around 6th and 7th, we need to ensure we finish out games like the Tigers @ ANZ a few weeks back.

See u at the game.

Have a great day everyone.


Well said Jodeci! Well said.
 

Craig Johnston

First Grade
Messages
5,396
Let's get a few facts correct here and this will be the last time I talk about this because quite frankly it's getting tired and boring of the same sh!t regarding the rubbish we continue to read. Thank god these AGM?s come around once a year.

The Season Tickets that were purchased by Roy were for 3rd party sponsors and corporates. These were sponsor commitments from prior to 2009, Being the commencement of the new Board?s tenure, and when the commitment was concluded Roy asked for these to be invoiced to the individuals. They were invoiced and subsequently paid.

The 900 page Russell Report which the newly elected board did only produced 1 thing against Roy, that Bob Bentley's bonus which as in his contract and signed by all board directors was paid after the elections and before the financial year. It was a contractual obligation and it had to be paid.

Roy was never suspended or found guilty of any wrong doings and the board reprimanded Roy without understanding the implications in the Constitution, which resulted in Roy not able to run for Board for 2 years. OLGR (Office Liquor Gaming and Racing) have gone through the 900 page report and are continuing their investigations into matters that have occurred over the last 18 months interviewing both directors and staff members of the Leagues Club.

Regarding the possible payout to Bob Bentley, why didn't the club negotiate a payout or settled this when they terminated his services rather sacking Bob and now the club has been taken to court and could put the Leagues Club out of pocket up to $550,000? If it's the same lawyer from the AGM, the club could be in a bit of strife.

Regarding the actual financials for the Leagues Club, what the overall figures don't show
you is the following:

Profit $3.8 mil. The NRL grant that each club gets was $7.1 mil up from the previous year of
$4.3 mil (that's an extra $2.7 mil). Property valuations up $1,4 mil. If the NRL gave clubs the
same grant like 2012, we actually made a loss for the first time since 2008. We can count our
lucky stars that the TV deal gives more clubs a bigger grant now.

2008: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit -$9.1 mil
2009: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit $1.1 mil
2010: NRL Grant $3.4 mil Profit $3.3 mil
2011: NRL Grant $3.6 mil Profit $5.2 mil
2012: NRL Grant $4.3 mil Profit $5.3 mil
2013: NRL Grant $7.1 mil Profit $3.3 mil

You have to give credit when it's due and Bob deserved it making $15 mil profit over those years as well as the reno's that took place.

People can sit here and whinge that they sold some units, they were instructed to do this from
the bank to reduce the debit the Leagues Club occurred in 2008.

I think Roy decided not to sue Mr Barrett from the SMH cause the article clearly showed no proof or
evidence of any misconduct and he firmly believes if the members want to believe that story
without seeking the truth, then that's their opinion and they are entitled to it. Both Glenn Jackson
and Danny Weidler both phoned Roy to retaliate but I believe he doesn't feel he needs to set the record
straight cause those who know him, know he is an honourable man.

Still to today, people like Aunty Kaye, Nathan Cayless, Luke Burt, Craig Catterick, Hayden Knowles, Wayne Beavis, Brian Smith, Nick Politis, Ray Dib and more have the ultimate respect for Roy and I've seen this with my own eyes.

Yes they may have been able to do some things better along the way, which they will probably agree, but it's a learning process and to continue seriously bagging out the bloke is getting very boring and even to the stage quite pathetic. Have a look at our renovated Club today compared to what they inherited in 2009. And there were further improvements planned.

We have a game on Monday which is much more important than this rubbish going on.
We beat the Sharks and we are back in this comp.

If we can stay within teams around 6th and 7th, we need to ensure we finish out games like the Tigers @ ANZ a few weeks back.

See u at the game.

Have a great day everyone.

nice
 

Delboy

First Grade
Messages
7,623
Has a meting with a prominent West Sydney businessman this week, to say that he respected Roy Nd what he did around the club is an understatement

As a TP sponsor he said he was aware how respected Roy was by the players etc., the issue was a certain ex CEO who continues to run a campaign with the help of a current board member

He also said that the reason Roy etc voted against the change to the board, was that it would have been challenged by you know who, and it would have meant a worse court type battle. Lots of other things said , but he was cheeky complimentary about Roy's involvement with club
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,907
Cheers mate. But those departures wouldn't have been in the 2012/13 financial year....as per the Chairman's Report in the Annual Report? Precisely why events taking place in the back half of 2012 hit the group accounts covering the 2013 calendar year isn't obvious to me, but I'm sure there's a reason. One could always get the NRL club accounts from ASIC, but I don't think I could be bothered spending the $30 :)

Clubs financial year is to December I think. Stuart and Edwards left in late 2013.
 
Messages
15,594
Let's get a few facts correct here and this will be the last time I talk about this because quite frankly it's getting tired and boring of the same sh!t regarding the rubbish we continue to read. Thank god these AGM?s come around once a year.

The Season Tickets that were purchased by Roy were for 3rd party sponsors and corporates. These were sponsor commitments from prior to 2009, Being the commencement of the new Board?s tenure, and when the commitment was concluded Roy asked for these to be invoiced to the individuals. They were invoiced and subsequently paid.

The 900 page Russell Report which the newly elected board did only produced 1 thing against Roy, that Bob Bentley's bonus which as in his contract and signed by all board directors was paid after the elections and before the financial year. It was a contractual obligation and it had to be paid.

Roy was never suspended or found guilty of any wrong doings and the board reprimanded Roy without understanding the implications in the Constitution, which resulted in Roy not able to run for Board for 2 years. OLGR (Office Liquor Gaming and Racing) have gone through the 900 page report and are continuing their investigations into matters that have occurred over the last 18 months interviewing both directors and staff members of the Leagues Club.

Regarding the possible payout to Bob Bentley, why didn't the club negotiate a payout or settled this when they terminated his services rather sacking Bob and now the club has been taken to court and could put the Leagues Club out of pocket up to $550,000? If it's the same lawyer from the AGM, the club could be in a bit of strife.

Regarding the actual financials for the Leagues Club, what the overall figures don't show
you is the following:

Profit $3.8 mil. The NRL grant that each club gets was $7.1 mil up from the previous year of
$4.3 mil (that's an extra $2.7 mil). Property valuations up $1,4 mil. If the NRL gave clubs the
same grant like 2012, we actually made a loss for the first time since 2008. We can count our
lucky stars that the TV deal gives more clubs a bigger grant now.

2008: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit -$9.1 mil
2009: NRL Grant $3.1 mil Profit $1.1 mil
2010: NRL Grant $3.4 mil Profit $3.3 mil
2011: NRL Grant $3.6 mil Profit $5.2 mil
2012: NRL Grant $4.3 mil Profit $5.3 mil
2013: NRL Grant $7.1 mil Profit $3.3 mil

You have to give credit when it's due and Bob deserved it making $15 mil profit over those years as well as the reno's that took place.

People can sit here and whinge that they sold some units, they were instructed to do this from
the bank to reduce the debit the Leagues Club occurred in 2008.

I think Roy decided not to sue Mr Barrett from the SMH cause the article clearly showed no proof or
evidence of any misconduct and he firmly believes if the members want to believe that story
without seeking the truth, then that's their opinion and they are entitled to it. Both Glenn Jackson
and Danny Weidler both phoned Roy to retaliate but I believe he doesn't feel he needs to set the record
straight cause those who know him, know he is an honourable man.

Still to today, people like Aunty Kaye, Nathan Cayless, Luke Burt, Craig Catterick, Hayden Knowles, Wayne Beavis, Brian Smith, Nick Politis, Ray Dib and more have the ultimate respect for Roy and I've seen this with my own eyes.

Yes they may have been able to do some things better along the way, which they will probably agree, but it's a learning process and to continue seriously bagging out the bloke is getting very boring and even to the stage quite pathetic. Have a look at our renovated Club today compared to what they inherited in 2009. And there were further improvements planned.

We have a game on Monday which is much more important than this rubbish going on.
We beat the Sharks and we are back in this comp.

If we can stay within teams around 6th and 7th, we need to ensure we finish out games like the Tigers @ ANZ a few weeks back.

See u at the game.

Have a great day everyone.

Question, Why do you have to say this, why can't Roy or the like say this on their own behalf.

They had a website, surely it isn't that hard to add such statements to a website and then point jounos and members to it, instead of relying on your good self Jodeci, to post on his behalf to this site.
 
Messages
17,663
Question, Why do you have to say this, why can't Roy or the like say this on their own behalf.

They had a website, surely it isn't that hard to add such statements to a website and then point jounos and members to it, instead of relying on your good self Jodeci, to post on his behalf to this site.

Fair go MITS, I don't see a problem with what he wrote. that's why they call this a forum. We can talk about anything here unless the plumber is the new moderator or something.... I find Jodeci's Posts informative.
 

Latest posts

Top