phantom eel
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,327
Good discussion gents.
But wasn't due process followed by the NRL giving the club the chance to respond, before determining final decision and/or penalties?I am actually quite happy they tried that case, it is interesting that by signing a contract and obtaining an NRL licence, the NRL can do what ever they want to our club without any due-process before announcing sanctions.
I feel that is wrong and something the clubs should work to change in the licence agreements in the future, now that they have that ruling.
That's kind of where my thinking is, any move for an EGM should take place/be supported only after the final decision is hanfed down. Otherwise it's just a tad premature imo?Now while I am sure the truth of all of this is somewhere in the middle, I will still wait to hear what our directors have to say after the ruling from the NRL before signing on to any action. Because doing it before is acting on allegations and not on facts.