the phantom menace
Coach
- Messages
- 11,613
Good on the government for calling that out demand out as silly, in the article Suity posted/quoted.
since when is it up to unions to set the train fares ? how the f**k would they know what it costs to run a rail network ?
boggles the mind
While the RBTU claims might seem far fetched. They are nice to haves for the most part. 50c fares for people who ride the busses and trains on the regular it would be a massive saving especially in the current cost of living environment. These are publicity winning demands.
Their main claims and reasons for being upset is the job losses. Less drivers and guards mean less members for the union.
But also from a member standpoint it means worrying times for drivers and guards, especially those getting just getting into their careers.
it would be like the world creating a robot builder the promised you a porch and then got chased by ACA, actual builders would wonder what the future held for them.
Here lies the problem with our two party system. We have one party and their philosophy is make it easier for people and that will lead to productivity and growth.The 50c fares are about the only thing I agree with. We should actually have free public transport and very, very cheap energy prices if our pollies were doing their jobs properly and looking out for the public which we elected them to do and not the transnationals.
What I do know though is that Qatar collects $76B a year in royalties for its LPG every year being the 3rd largest exporter in the world and Australia collects $2B a year and we are the 2nd largest exporter in the world. Let that sink in.
Numbers don't seem to add up between various reports, but definitely not enough excise is charged on our LNG exports.Where did you source this information from?
Where did you source this information from?
Numbers don't seem to add up between various reports, but definitely not enough excise is charged on our LNG exports.
'Daylight robbery': Independents lash Australian gas royalty scheme
Independent senator David Pocock calls the Australian gas industry "leeches" in response to a report that found over half of Australia's LNG export facilities pay no royalties.www.abc.net.auDespite soaring production and revenues the gas industry is not paying more tax
Despite soaring production and revenues the gas industry is not paying more tax.futurework.org.auAustralia’s great gas giveaway
According to the Australian Government’s Future Gas Strategy, gas is “critical” to the nation’s economy. In view of this, many Australians might be surprised to learn that a large amount of the country’s gas reserves are essentially being given away for free.australiainstitute.org.au
Here lies the problem with our two party system. We have one party and their philosophy is make it easier for people and that will lead to productivity and growth.
The other party don't like government to be the providers of transport or health etc and prefer that the user pays for it. They think smaller government is the best way to productivity and growth.
I am not saying either system is right or wrong, but when you have both that are the polar opposites in policy, you're going to run into problems. Especially when there is a change in government.
At he moment NSW Transport has been set up as being semi autonomous with many bus and ferry routes already privatised. Our light rail (I think) is also privatised. Heavy rail is not, but is expected to make coin. It's all over the place. Metro is privatised too ? Dunno.
The chap in QLD has made 50c fares across the board, but we all know that if he does not win the election (polls suggest that the appetite for change is there) that the new government will want their public transport back to where it was and switch it immediately sighting irresponsible budget management. The reality is that it just doesn't fit in with their political mindset.
There are cities across the world that have free transport and even zoom zoom broadband and productivity high. Yes, nothing is really free and ultimately your taxes will need to increase to pay for it. As I said, it's just a different mindset. Provide the infrastructure, or make merkins pay for it via private enterprise.
^^^ I think I posted a graphic a few weeks ago from the Australian Institute that showed that the AU government gets more cash from HECS payments than it does from the gas industry.
The fossil fuel industry should be paying for our resources and we should be using that to pay off student debt.
Santos - our biggest gas exporter paid $6m tax from it's $30B income.
But that's the problem - they can't all be voted out, someone has to be elected each time.Unless we collectively vote them all out, then it will only get worse and never better.
Old Mate Johnny Howard sold our gas on a 25 year contract.
How Australia blew its future gas supplies
How Australia blew its future gas supplies by flogging it to China for a pittance.www.smh.com.au
Norway were very smart from the 1970's about their resources. They created a framework which gave them control over their resources and this resulted in significant profits.The good news is we can tear up any or all of these contracts and or restructure our sales business plan whenever we want and demand we get paid what we are entitled to just like Norway did.