No matter which metric you use, the bleeding obvious point is there's clubs in Sydney that will always be more of a liability than an actual asset because they represent small regions with too few people to ever have a large fanbase. By having these teams chewing up precious licences it's left us with Brisbane having just two teams, New Zealand with just one and Adelaide and Perth with none.
You might say "add more teams", but there's not enough half-backs, five-eights, dummy halves and fullbacks to fill 16 rosters. We don't have enough quality spine players to cover more than a few teams. Our development system does nothing to develop quality half-backs and five-eights who can organise a team and get the ball where it needs to go. A team with poor quality spine players is a bore to watch and will finish down the bottom of the ladder. Queensland dominated Origin for eight years because it a litany of world class spine players while NSW had none. That's how important these four positions are to a football team's success.
We would need to expand to 22 or 24 teams to cover everywhere without rationalising Sydney. We don't have the talent pool or money to support a competition of this size. So rationalisation is a necessity for the game to grow. Good luck having 16 or more clubs averaging 20k when the talent pool is so dire it puts people off from wanting to watch also-rans run around like headless chooks.
Rams and Reds were cut to appease NSWRL clubs and fans. The Bradley Report said the competition needed to be rationalised to 14 teams with Sydney having no more than five. The NSWRL clubs refused to play ball, so News Ltd and the ARL went about eliminating Non-Sydney teams to get the number down to 14 by 2000.
I said it would get closer. Not equal. These things only matter to FTA.
Dolphins will be playing at least two games at a boutique stadium with a capacity od just 11.5k. The Women's soccer world cup will force clubs out or their traditional venues for significant periods of the season.
You obviously don't understand the game and its history all that well. It's foolish to expect Queenslanders to care for privileged Sydney clubs who used gaming machine revenue to rape and pillage the BRL into extinction for 30 years and then f**ked over the Broncos, Cowboys, Crushers and Chargers. They also screwed over the Reds. Brisbane has been limited to just one team by a Sydney-centric ARL that always put the interests of Sydney's clubs ahead of everyone else. The NSWRL went out of its way to weaken the Queensland Cup about 12 years ago and the ARLC under V'landys is now trying to destroy it altogether to bring back three grades that no one will watch. This will lead to clubs that have existed since 1908 becoming irrelevant or possibly folding.
The anger towards traditional NSWRL clubs is justified and will not go away just because you think it is "dumb".
RL in Perth as been f**ked over by the NSWRL too, hence the reason
@Perth Red is rightfully upset with the game. The people who childishly attack
@Perth Red and braindead NSWRL fans whoa want a return to the NSWRFL Premiership. They don't give a f**k about the game outside of Sydney and think Queensland, New South Wales and New Zealand exist solely to prop up the nine shit teams from Sydney. If you wish to throw your lot in with these hillbillies from Sydney then be my guest, but don't come whinging to me when they want the Storm to be kicked out, which a lot of them do.
What's the point in hating AFL like these blokes do?
It doesn't make RL stronger.