The_Wookie
Bench
- Messages
- 3,243
Revenue increase is irrelevant when we are talking about % of revenue allocated. The higher % allocated to clubs the lower % allocated elsewhere.
Maybe its coming from the cost cutting. or maybe its coming from the $35mill that was missing in grassroots and development funding last year? We will have to see if that money has been put back and increased accordingly as a % of revenue in the financial for this year before we will know for sure
No you were specifically as cited as knowing the "amount" that had been reduced. If it was cited as a reduction in the "percentage" spend relative to revenue thats something else entirely. If revenue increased and costs are cut, then its possible to increase spending elsewhere without reducing the actual amount of spending on grassroots even if the percantage of revenue spend is less.
Was there actually 35m missing in grassroots and development funding last year? It was reported that 40m was "in jeopardy" in March, with it possibly being handed to the clubs instead. Whether this happened or not, we wont really know until the annual report is released.
NSWRL spat jeopardises $40m of new grassroots funding
The biggest beneficiaries of “Project Climb”, a $40m initiative to boost player participation, could be left out of pocket following the NSWRL boardroom stoush.
www.smh.com.au