Adelaide oval holds similarComes to value for money.
Suncorp only holds 52k. So you won't get all the tourists to justify spending much more
Adelaide oval holds similarComes to value for money.
Suncorp only holds 52k. So you won't get all the tourists to justify spending much more
Is Badel really trying to sell $20mil over 10 years as a "monster" deal, what a wanker lol. I would've laughed in Qld's face if I was the NRL.
Is that all they pay 2 million pa ? That’s peanuts
Are you serious? The AFL got $80mil over three years from SA for Gather Round. Obviously not all of that $80mil is cash, but they received $15mil in cash for this year's. The NRL should be asking for a similar deal.Comes to value for money.
Suncorp only holds 52k. So you won't get all the tourists to justify spending much more
Is that 20 mill, per year? Or all up over the 10 year period
Is that all they pay 2 million pa ? That’s peanuts
Are you serious? The AFL got $80mil over three years from SA for Gather Round. Obviously not all of that $80mil is cash, but they received $15mil in cash for this year's. The NRL should be asking for a similar deal.
$2mil a season over 10 seasons is an absolute joke, and Qld are clowns for even suggesting it.
Is that 20 mill, per year? Or all up over the 10 year period
A 10-year $20mil deal would be $2mil a year for 10 years.The article says it currently is worth $2.1m a year. $20m over 10 years is less, So it has to be $20m a year
Especially as the article says it brings in $28m
Just make another magic round....teheIt’s still a bad deal even if it is $200mil over 10 years as 10 years is way too long. All locking the deal in for that long does is stifle competition, which would be great for QLD but terrible for the NRL.
Maybe not if the money is paid up-front. HST I can`t imagine the journo would make a typo on such a significant point. $2m/annum on the other hand is ludicrously way too little.A 10-year $20mil deal would be $2mil a year for 10 years.
Now maybe it’s a typo and he meant to say that it’s a $200mil offer, but if that’s the case you’d be saying as much as you obviously have access to the actual article.
It’s still a bad deal even if it is $200mil over 10 years as 10 years is way too long. All locking the deal in for that long does is stifle competition, which would be great for QLD but terrible for the NRL.
NSW Gov only offered $160M for 20 years of Grand finals?
Why would you think QLD Gov would pay more for magic round?
If the GF is worth $8M to the NRL, then magic round would only be worth a half or quarter than that. (Note i dont believe NRL actually accepted that offer)
Also if NSW Gov paid $15M for the A-League GF over the next 3 years, the NRL should be asking for five times that amount
Nah I’m taking it as 2 millon paI took it as $20m a year
Yep if the fumblers are getting 15 million pa we should at least be matching thatThat is just another example of our poor negotiating.
I see a lot of people comparing apples to oranges after complaining about a certain poster supposedly doing the same thing.
NSW Gov only offered $160M for 20 years of Grand finals?
Why would you think QLD Gov would pay more for magic round?
If the GF is worth $8M to the NRL, then magic round would only be worth a half or quarter than that. (Note i dont believe NRL actually accepted that offer)
Also if NSW Gov paid $15M for the A-League GF over the next 3 years, the NRL should be asking for five times that amount
That is just another example of our poor negotiating.
Didn't this include an $800 million redevelopment of Allianz that they reneged on?NSW Gov only offered $160M for 20 years of Grand finals?
Why would you think QLD Gov would pay more for magic round?
If the GF is worth $8M to the NRL, then magic round would only be worth a half or quarter than that. (Note i dont believe NRL actually accepted that offer)
Also if NSW Gov paid $15M for the A-League GF over the next 3 years, the NRL should be asking for five times that amount
SeparateDidn't this include an $800 million redevelopment of Allianz that they reneged on?