- Messages
- 68,422
My best theory is you're just plain wrong
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-31/doolan-misses-out-on-cricket-australia-contract/5356608
owned :lol:
My best theory is you're just plain wrong
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-31/doolan-misses-out-on-cricket-australia-contract/5356608
So 5 and a half runs per innings difference despite Rogers having (basically) 1 uninterrupted run in his natural position. While Hughes has been in and out and in and out while up and down the order.Chris Rogers average 38.14
Phail Hughes average 32.65
So 5 and a half runs per innings difference despite Rogers having (basically) 1 uninterrupted run in his natural position. While Hughes has been in and out and in and out while up and down the order.
When edbbxbdbwbbeb you allow for that Hughes average is superior.
He did fine against Swann in his second most recent test.
:lol:a lower average is superior :lol:
he said nothing of the sort you idiot http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket...-team-20140818-105g87.html?rand=1408359967053
So 5 and a half runs per innings difference despite Rogers having (basically) 1 uninterrupted run in his natural position. While Hughes has been in and out and in and out while up and down the order.
When you allow for that Hughes average is superior.
Based on that theory, cause he has been in and out of the test side a heck of a lot (due to injuries) we can conclude Shane Watson is a superior bat to Sir Donald Bradman :lol:
http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket...ars-ashes-series/story-fn2mcu3x-1227029165789
Watch the 2nd video. "Lehmann excited by Hughes"
BOOM.
That's video and audio from the man himself. Not your cut and paste article with shit taken out of context by some wanker at the SMH.
If Don Bradman averaged 41.7 then that would be comparable to the Hughes-Rogers comparison.
Lehmann is that excited that he is planning Haddin and Finch opening haha