Comparing Vietnam to Afghanistan....
When the Russians marched into Afghanistan, the US media gleefully called it 'Russia's Vietnam'.
They were right but they promoted it such a way to show the world that the Russians in the 90s were even more stupid than the Americans were in the 60s.
So what does that say about the yanks now?
There are loads of similarities between the Afghanistan / Vietnam conflicts.
Both are/were promoted as 'a fight against evil'.
Both are/were promoted as a war against an ill equipped anduncivilised foe.
Both are/were being used by western leaders for political purposes.
Both are/were being fought in difficult terrain.
Both are/were being defended by soldiers who firmly believe in their cause.
Both are/were widely supported early on byan electorate who were fearful of the enemy.
Thus far, one war (Vietnam) was later condemned as a human catastrophe.
But there is a slight difference. In Vietnam, the fight was against a political ideal, communism. The ultimate aim was to drive the commies out of Vietnam and set it up as a democratic state, protected by the USA.
In Afghanistan, the USA are chasing a shadowy objective, Terrorism. They have effectively potrayed Osama bin Laden as their main target... one man. They haven'treally identified the Taliban as their prime target. They have even said that there is no guarantee that the Taliban will be ousted... so really, victory (in the eyes of the west) will only happen with the death of bin Laden.
This is interesting because while the Vietnam war was initially supported and then opposed, it still had more going for it than the invasion of Afghanistan.
It stands to reason that given time, the war in Afghanistan will go down as an even bigger blunder and with that, the protestors will continue to grow in numbers.
I wouldn't be surprised if in 3 years time, we have an election withthe majority of people voting forany party which has in it's policy, a promise to withdraw Australian troops.