personally this is the best rectangular stadium I've ever been too. only one that trumps Suncorp. Reliant stadium in Houston Texas
would be great if they bulldozed ANZ and built this. with maybe an extra 10,000 capacity. current capacity is around 72,000 I believe.
Well it was built purely for the Olympics track and field events with capacity being the #1 priority.
Closeness and viewing angle for rectangular events? pfft.
The whole idea from the very start was a multi purpose stadium that would house RL , RU , Soccer , Cricket & AFL.
The Olympic stadium was initially completed in March 1999 at a cost of $690 million and was used as host stadium for the 2000 Summer Olympics. It was originally built to hold 110,000 spectators, making it the largest Olympic Stadium ever built and the largest stadium in Australia.
However, after the conclusion of the games, the stadium required reconfiguration in order to make it more functional for a variety of popular sporting events including Rugby and other sports requiring the use of an oval field, such as cricket and Australian Rules football.
Brookfield Multiplex undertook the reconfiguration in 2001, which included the shortening of the north and south wings and the introduction of an athletics track and a movable seating section. Awnings were also added over the north and south stands, offering patrons under cover seating.
These changes reduced the stadium’s capacity from 110,000 to 83,500 for a rectangular field and 81,500 for an oval field. The new multi-sport field meant that 54 per cent of all seats were at least 15 metres closer to the field.
Brookfield Multiplex engineered the stadium to comply with sustainable design principles, including the reduced use of steel materials in the roof structure in comparison to other Olympic stadiums.
The reconfiguration was performed at a total cost of $80 million, leaving Stadium Australia as the second largest stadium in Australia, after the Melbourne Cricket Ground. The reconfiguration work was completed by Brookfield Multiplex in October 2003, in time for the 2003 Rugby World Cup where the stadium hosted the opening game.
54% of the seats were improved??
Which f**king ones??? The lower western terrace can roll in but other than that, I am pretty sure none of the other seats were shifted/adjusted since the olympics finished........... I fail to see how that is 50%
My guess is they're including the ends , which prior to the reconfiguration were not covered.
waste of money.
shit ground will always be shit.
doesn't matter how you dress it up with statements of moving seats forward, the bulk of seats can't be moved and this is the problem. built to accommodate an athletics track, the core of the east and west grandstands are set too far back and sightlines are terrible.
only nuffies think a roof will improve anything.
The NRL shouldn't commit to anything until afl and cricket have been told to leave the negotiating table. They can't commit $250 mil to the stadium if their biggest tenant isn't happy with it being oval. Grow some balls NRL!
The NRL shouldn't commit to anything until afl and cricket have been told to leave the negotiating table. They can't commit $250 mil to the stadium if their biggest tenant isn't happy with it being oval. Grow some balls NRL!